Literature DB >> 12037224

Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study.

J Ratcliffe1, R Van Haselen, M Buxton, K Hardy, J Colehan, M Partridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to investigate the preferences of patients with asthma for attributes or characteristics associated with treatment for their asthma and to investigate the extent to which such preferences may differ between patient subgroups.
METHODS: The economic technique of conjoint analysis (CA) was used to investigate patients' strength of preference for several key attributes associated with services for the treatment of asthma. A CA questionnaire was administered to two groups of asthma outpatients aged 18 years or older, 150 receiving conventional treatment at Whipps Cross Hospital (WC) and 150 receiving homeopathic treatment at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital (RL).
RESULTS: An overall response rate of 47% (n=142) was achieved. Statistically significant attributes in influencing preferences for both the WC and RL respondents were (1) the extent to which the doctor gave sufficient time to listen to what the patient has to say, (2) the extent to which the treatment seemed to relieve symptoms, and (3) the travel costs of attending for an asthma consultation. The extent to which the doctor treated the patient as a whole person was also a statistically significant attribute for the RL respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that aspects associated with the process of delivery of asthma services are important to patients in addition to treatment outcomes. The homeopathic respondents expressed stronger preferences for the doctor to treat them as a whole person than the patients receiving conventional treatment. Overall, the preferences for the attributes included in the study were similar for both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12037224      PMCID: PMC1746347          DOI: 10.1136/thorax.57.6.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  11 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight.

Authors:  M Ryan; E McIntosh; T Dean; P Old
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-06

4.  Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible?

Authors:  D Reilly; M A Taylor; N G Beattie; J H Campbell; C McSharry; T C Aitchison; R Carter; R D Stevenson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: an investigation of preferences.

Authors:  S Bryan; M Buxton; R Sheldon; A Grant
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Ratcliffe; M Buxton
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms.

Authors:  L M Osman; L McKenzie; J Cairns; J A Friend; D J Godden; J S Legge; J G Douglas
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Doctor-patient communication.

Authors:  B M Korsch; V F Negrete
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis.

Authors:  M van der Pol; J Cairns
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-04

10.  Adherence with twice-daily dosing of inhaled steroids. Socioeconomic and health-belief differences.

Authors:  A J Apter; S T Reisine; G Affleck; E Barrows; R L ZuWallack
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  19 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of changes in patients' constructs of quality of life: an application of multilevel models.

Authors:  Adam Lowy; Jürg Bernhard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  How does patients' quality of life guide their preferences regarding aspects of asthma therapy?: a patient-preference study using discrete-choice experiment methodology.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Emma McIntosh; Angela E Williams; Ad Kaptein; Klaus F Rabe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Understanding reasons for asthma outpatient (non)-attendance and exploring the role of telephone and e-consulting in facilitating access to care: exploratory qualitative study.

Authors:  J D van Baar; H Joosten; J Car; G K Freeman; M R Partridge; C van Weel; A Sheikh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

4.  Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar; Carol Armour; John M Rose; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzana Karim; Benjamin M Craig; Caroline Vass; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.558

6.  Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Nashmia Qamar; Andrea A Pappalardo; Vineet M Arora; Valerie G Press
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-03-06

7.  Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values.

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Johannes Clouth; Marc Deutschmann; Hans-J Hippler
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Patient satisfaction and side effects in primary care: an observational study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicine.

Authors:  Florica Marian; Kerstin Joost; Krishan D Saini; Klaus von Ammon; André Thurneysen; André Busato
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Complementary therapy use by patients and parents of children with asthma and the implications for NHS care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Shaw; Elizabeth A Thompson; Debbie Sharp
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Men's preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  E W de Bekker-Grob; J M Rose; B Donkers; M-L Essink-Bot; C H Bangma; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.