Literature DB >> 12027377

Saccharin as a sugar surrogate revisited.

James C Smith1, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Two papers by George Collier are reviewed and replications and extensions of these data are presented. The first paper by Collier and Bolles (1968) reported the total caloric intake of rats during sucrose versus water preference tests. In addition, a paired comparison was made with each of a wide range of sucrose solutions. The latter experiment resulted in a re-thinking of "preference" in that it showed that although rats drank more of a middle range concentration, they always consumed more of the higher concentrations in paired comparison tests. Many other behavioral studies have confirmed that the rat's attraction to the taste of sucrose is a direct function of sucrose concentration. The second paper by Collier and Novell (1967) reported that saccharin was similar to sucrose in that intake increased and then decreased as concentration increased, although in direct choice tests, higher concentrations were preferred to lower ones except in one case. Subsequent studies using a wider range of saccharin concentrations and a variety of test measures revealed, however, that saccharin preference and acceptance decreases substantially as concentration exceeds 0.4% (19.5 mM). Furthermore, saccharin versus sucrose choice tests indicate that optimal saccharin solutions (0.2-0.4%) are "isopreferred" to only dilute sucrose solutions (2-4%). Thus, at best, saccharin is only a weak surrogate for sugar. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12027377     DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  26 in total

1.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Daily limited access to sweetened drink attenuates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis stress responses.

Authors:  Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai; Michelle M Ostrander; Ingrid M Thomas; Benjamin A Packard; Amy R Furay; C Mark Dolgas; Daniella C Van Hooren; Helmer F Figueiredo; Nancy K Mueller; Dennis C Choi; James P Herman
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Effects of saccharin intake on hippocampal and cortical plasticity in juvenile and adolescent rats.

Authors:  Jong-Sil Park; Sang Bae Yoo; Jin Young Kim; Sung Joong Lee; Seog-Bae Oh; Joong-Soo Kim; Jong-Ho Lee; Kyungpyo Park; Jeong Won Jahng; Se-Young Choi
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.016

4.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Decreased consumption of rewarding sucrose solutions after injection of melanocortins into the ventral tegmental area of rats.

Authors:  Haw-Han Yen; Aaron G Roseberry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Mixtures of Sweeteners and Maltodextrin Enhance Flavor and Intake of Alcohol in Adolescent Rats.

Authors:  Alice Sardarian; Sophia Liu; Steven L Youngentob; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Role of caloric homeostasis and reward in alcohol intake in Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  Danielle Gulick; Alan I Green
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-08-03

8.  Activation of physiological stress responses by a natural reward: Novel vs. repeated sucrose intake.

Authors:  Ann E Egan; Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-03-05

9.  Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; James C Smith; Anthony Sclafani; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Nucleus accumbens GLP-1 receptors influence meal size and palatability.

Authors:  Amanda M Dossat; Ryan Diaz; Lindsay Gallo; Alyssa Panagos; Kristen Kay; Diana L Williams
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.