Literature DB >> 12026751

Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximize clinician survey response rates.

Elaine Puleo1, Jane Zapka, Mary Jo White, Judy Mouchawar, Carol Somkin, Stephen Taplin.   

Abstract

An ongoing objective in health services research is to increase response rates to clinician surveys to ensure generalizability of findings. Three HMOs in the Cancer Research Network participated in a primary care clinician survey to better understand organizational characteristics affecting adoption and implementation of breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines. A four-stage data collection strategy was implemented to maximize response. This included careful attention to survey design and layout, extensive piloting, choice of token incentive, use of "local champions," and denominator management. An overall response rate of 91% was attained, ranging from 83 to 100% among the plans (N = 621). Although the response rate after the second stage of data collection met commonly used standards, the authors argue for the four-stage method due to the possibility of differences when comparing early and late responders. This is important when multiple plans with differing structure and internal characteristics are surveyed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12026751     DOI: 10.1177/016327870202500203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

Review 1.  Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire.

Authors:  Petra M Boynton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-05

2.  Physician perspectives on colorectal cancer surveillance care in a changing environment.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Katherine R Sterba; Nancy LaPelle; Kent Armeson; Dana R Burshell; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Robert M Jacobson; Sarah M Jenkins; Kandace A Lackore; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.

Authors:  Y Martins; R I Lederman; C L Lowenstein; S Joffe; B A Neville; B T Hastings; G A Abel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Sustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research Network.

Authors:  John F Steiner; Andrea R Paolino; Ella E Thompson; Eric B Larson
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-06-09

7.  Attitudes towards Prosthodontic Clinical Decision-Making for Edentulous Patients among South West Deanery Dental Foundation Year One Dentists.

Authors:  Andrew Barber; James Puryer; Sam Leary; Lisa McNally; Dominic O'Sullivan
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-10

8.  The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians' disclosure practices.

Authors:  Lesley Weaver; Timothy J Beebe; Todd Rockwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  The CIVISANO protocol: a mixed-method study about the role of objective and perceived environmental factors on physical activity and eating behavior among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.

Authors:  Suzannah D'Hooghe; Yasemin Inaç; Eva De Clercq; Benedicte Deforche; Sarah Dury; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Nico Van de Weghe; Delfien Van Dyck; Karin De Ridder
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.