Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire.

Literature DB >> 15178620

Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire.

Petra M Boynton¹.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15178620 PMCID： PMC420299 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1372

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

9 in total

Review 1. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors: E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors: Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-05-18

3. Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximize clinician survey response rates.

Authors: Elaine Puleo; Jane Zapka; Mary Jo White; Judy Mouchawar; Carol Somkin; Stephen Taplin
Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.651

4. Contribution of follow-up of nonresponders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey.

Authors: Jan Brøgger; Per Bakke; Geir E Eide; Amund Gulsvik
Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 4.897

5. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.

Authors: Scott D Halpern; Peter A Ubel; Jesse A Berlin; David A Asch
Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.983

6. Reaching beyond the white middle classes.

Authors: Petra M Boynton; Gary W Wood; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-06-12

Review 7. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.

Authors: Petra M Boynton; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-05-29

8. Factors affecting general practice patient response rates to a postal survey of health status in England: a comparative analysis of three disease groups.

Authors: K A Meadows; E Gardiner; T Greene; D Rogers; D Russell; L Smoljanovic
Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 2.431

9. An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms.

Authors: H M Dallosso; R J Matthews; C W McGrother; M Clarke; S I Perry; C Shaw; C Jagger
Journal: BJU Int Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.588

9 in total

60 in total

9. External versus internal abutment connection implants: a survey of opinions and decision making among experienced implant dentists in Japan.

Authors: Yoshiyuki Hagiwara; Alan B Carr
Journal: Odontology Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.634

Review 10. Conducting high-quality research in cardiothoracic surgical education: Recommendations from the Thoracic Education Cooperative Group.

Authors: Mara B Antonoff; Stephanie Nguyen; Tom C Nguyen; David D Odell
Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 5.209

Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire.

Review 1. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Review 2. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

3. Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximize clinician survey response rates.

4. Contribution of follow-up of nonresponders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey.

5. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.

6. Reaching beyond the white middle classes.

Review 7. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.

8. Factors affecting general practice patient response rates to a postal survey of health status in England: a comparative analysis of three disease groups.

9. An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms.

1. Reaching beyond the white middle classes.

Review 2. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.

3. Sialendoscopy: what is it and what is its awareness?

Review 4. Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research.

Review 5. Questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders.

6. Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers.

Review 7. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

8. The physiologic climate of Nigeria.

9. External versus internal abutment connection implants: a survey of opinions and decision making among experienced implant dentists in Japan.

Review 10. Conducting high-quality research in cardiothoracic surgical education: Recommendations from the Thoracic Education Cooperative Group.