Literature DB >> 29355920

Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.

Timothy J Beebe1, Robert M Jacobson2, Sarah M Jenkins3, Kandace A Lackore4, Lila J Finney Rutten5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare response rate and nonresponse bias across two mixed-mode survey designs and two single-mode designs. DATA SOURCES: This experiment was embedded in a clinician survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV vaccination (n = 275). STUDY
DESIGN: Clinicians were randomly assigned one of two mixed-mode (mail/web or web/mail) or single-mode designs (mail-only/web-only). Differences in response rate and nonresponse bias were assessed. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Using a multiple-contact protocol increased response, and sending a web survey first provided the more rapid response. Overall, the mixed-mode survey designs generated final response rates approximately 10 percentage points higher than their single-mode counterparts, although only the final response differences between the mail-only and web/mail conditions attained statistical significance (32.1 percent vs. 48 percent, respectively; p = .005). Observed differences did not result in nonresponse bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Results support mixing modes of survey administration and web-based data collection in a multiple contact survey data collection protocol. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  Survey methods; clinician surveys; mode effects; response rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29355920      PMCID: PMC6056581          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  35 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

3.  Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys.

Authors:  T K Schleyer; J L Forrest
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane S Hocking; Megan S C Lim; Tim Read; Margaret Hellard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Mail versus internet surveys: determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals.

Authors:  Christine Lusk; George L Delclos; Keith Burau; Derek D Drawhorn; Lu Ann Aday
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Combining web-based and mail surveys improves response rates: a PBRN study from PRIME Net.

Authors:  Philip J Kroth; Laurie McPherson; Robert Leverence; Wilson Pace; Elvan Daniels; Robert L Rhyne; Robert L Williams
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.

Authors:  C Thorpe; B Ryan; S L McLean; A Burt; M Stewart; J B Brown; G J Reid; S Harris
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system.

Authors:  Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Joshua J Pankratz; Scott M Brue; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Clinician knowledge, clinician barriers, and perceived parental barriers regarding human papillomavirus vaccination: Association with initiation and completion rates.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Jennifer L St Sauver; Timothy J Beebe; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan T Vadaparampil; Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning-Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ginestra; Heather M Giannini; William D Schweickert; Laurie Meadows; Michael J Lynch; Kimberly Pavan; Corey J Chivers; Michael Draugelis; Patrick J Donnelly; Barry D Fuchs; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women: Views and Experiences of Obstetrician-Gynecologists.

Authors:  Gillian K SteelFisher; Hannah L Caporello; Cheryl S Broussard; Thomas J Schafer; Eran N Ben-Porath; Robert J Blendon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.017

3.  The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians' disclosure practices.

Authors:  Lesley Weaver; Timothy J Beebe; Todd Rockwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Data Quality of Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Assessments.

Authors:  Hongfan Yu; Qingsong Yu; Yuxian Nie; Wei Xu; Yang Pu; Wei Dai; Xing Wei; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  How to ask: Surveying nursing directors of nursing homes.

Authors:  Jessica A R Williams; Mary G Vriniotis; Daniel A Gundersen; Leslie I Boden; Jamie E Collins; Jeffrey N Katz; Gregory R Wagner; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04

6.  Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vincent Maurice Meyer; Stan Benjamens; Mostafa El Moumni; Johan F M Lange; Robert A Pol
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.