Literature DB >> 12025895

Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response.

Shigeyuki Kuwada1, Julia S Anderson, Ranjan Batra, Douglas C Fitzpatrick, Natacha Teissier, William R D'Angelo.   

Abstract

The scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR) is gaining recognition as an objective audiometric tool, but little is known about the neural sources that underlie this potential. We hypothesized, based on our human studies and single-unit recordings in animals, that the scalp-recorded AMFR reflects the interaction of multiple sources. We tested this hypothesis using an animal model, the unanesthetized rabbit. We compared AMFRs recorded from the surface of the brain at different locations and before and after the administration of agents likely to enhance or suppress neural generators. We also recorded AMFRs locally at several stations along the auditory neuraxis. We conclude that the surface-recorded AMFR is indeed a composite response from multiple brain generators. Although the response at any modulation frequency can reflect the activity of more than one generator, the AMFRs to low and high modulation frequencies appear to reflect a strong contribution from cortical and subcortical sources, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12025895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  56 in total

1.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

3.  Age-Related Changes in Processing Simultaneous Amplitude Modulated Sounds Assessed Using Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-23

4.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Auditory fear conditioning modifies steady-state evoked potentials in the rat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  André Luiz Vieira Lockmann; Flávio Afonso Gonçalves Mourão; Marcio Flávio Dutra Moraes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Differences in postinjury auditory system pathophysiology after mild blast and nonblast acute acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Nicholas Race; Jesyin Lai; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.