Literature DB >> 12024137

Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.

John B Marshall1, Rodney A Perez, Richard W Madsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy can be difficult in some women who have undergone hysterectomy, which can be associated with a fixed, angulated sigmoid colon caused by postoperative pelvic adhesions. Our goal was to determine whether colonoscopy is easier and more comfortable for women after hysterectomy when performed with a pediatric colonoscope, which is thinner in diameter and more flexible than a standard "adult" colonoscope.
METHODS: One hundred women with a history of hysterectomy undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomized in unblinded fashion to colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope (CF-100L or CF-Q140L, Olympus) or with a pediatric colonoscope (PCF-100, Olympus). All procedures were performed by a faculty endoscopist and timed. After examination, the endoscopist graded procedure difficulty, and patients were given a questionnaire that assessed their experience.
RESULTS: The cecum was intubated more frequently in the pediatric colonoscope group than in the standard colonoscope group (96.1% vs. 71.4%, p < 0.001). Success increased in the standard colonoscope group to 89.8% when the pediatric colonoscope was used to complete the examination. There were no differences in the two groups in terms of mean total procedure times (21.4 minutes vs. 22.6 minutes), mean doses of meperidine administered (57 mg both groups), mean doses of midazolam administered (1.5 mg vs. 1.7 mg), scales of procedure difficulty as graded by the endoscopists, and comfort scales as graded by patients. For the cases in which the cecum was intubated, the mean time to reach the cecum (11.7 minutes for the pediatric colonoscope group vs. 12.7 minutes for the adult) was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric colonoscope is a reasonable choice for colonoscopy in women who have had a hysterectomy. Alternatively, if the endoscopist elects to start the procedure with a standard colonoscope, it is helpful to have a pediatric colonoscope available for use should a fixed, angulated sigmoid colon be encountered that cannot be easily or safely traversed with the standard colonoscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12024137     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.124562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Underutilisation of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults: a survey of two European countries.

Authors:  Andriani Koumi; Evangelos Kalaitzakis; Alastair Forbes; Marios Z Panos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Fumiko Shigiyama; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Hirahata; Daisuke Hihara; Kenji Tominaga; Ichiro Yasuda; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ivana Dzeletovic; M Edwyn Harrison; Shabana F Pasha; Michael D Crowell; G Anton Decker; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women.

Authors:  Lyssa Chacko; Carole Macaron; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques.

Authors:  Yark Hazewinkel; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  "Passive-bending colonoscope" significantly improves cecal intubation in difficult cases.

Authors:  Takeshi Mizukami; Haruhiko Ogata; Toshihumi Hibi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comfort and efficacy of a longer and thinner endoscope for average risk colon cancer screening.

Authors:  R Keith Fincher; Jonathan Myers; Scott McNear; John D Liveringhouse; Richard L Topolski; Jennifer McNear
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Jun Kato; Motoaki Kuriyama; Keisuke Hori; Shin Ishikawa; Keita Harada; Koji Takemoto; Sakiko Hiraoka; Hideyuki Fujita; Joichiro Horii; Yutaka Saito; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

Authors:  T R Levin; F A Farraye; R E Schoen; G Hoff; W Atkin; J H Bond; S Winawer; R W Burt; D A Johnson; L M Kirk; S C Litin; D K Rex
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.