Literature DB >> 22395658

Underutilisation of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults: a survey of two European countries.

Andriani Koumi1, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Alastair Forbes, Marios Z Panos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: High caecal intubation success rates have been reported with the gastroscope in adults. We surveyed the current use of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults in the UK and Greece.
METHODS: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 952 members of the British Society of Gastroenterology (UK) and 478 members of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (GR), enquiring as to access to a paediatric colonoscope, use of gastroscope for total colonoscopy and estimate of caecal intubation success rate.
RESULTS: Valid replies were 17.4% from UK and 19.7% from GR. The paediatric colonoscope was available to 106/138 (77%) UK and to only 18/86 (21%) GR respondents (p = 0.0002). Of all the UK and GR respondents, 109/138 (79%) and 68/86 (79%), respectively, did not use the gastroscope for total colonoscopy. For the use of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy, 26/29 (89%) UK and 9/18 (50%) GR users did so, while a paediatric colonoscope was also available (p = 0.001), and 3/29 (10.3%) UK and 9/18 (50%) GR users did so, whilst they had no access to a paediatric colonoscope (p = 0.001). Estimated gastroscope caecal intubation success rate was 69% (SD 0.26) UK and 46% (SD 0.36) GR, p = 0.008. Only 37% UK and 28% GR respondents used the gastroscope to examine the left colon.
CONCLUSIONS: The gastroscope is underutilised for total colonoscopy in both the UK and Greece. Use of the gastroscope does not appear to be related to lack of access to a paediatric colonoscope in the UK but may be in GR. Gastroscope caecal intubation success rate justifies its use where the colonoscope fails.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395658     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1436-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

Review 1.  Advances in colonic imaging: technical improvements in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gregor J E Brown; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Transparent hood attached to a gastroscope: a simple rescue technique for patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  T Shida; S Takano; M Kaiho; M Miyazaki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J C Brooker; B P Saunders; S G Shah; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C Thapar; C B Williams; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.

Authors:  J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.

Authors:  John B Marshall; Rodney A Perez; Richard W Madsen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Chang-Hwan Park; Wan-Sik Lee; Young-Eun Joo; Hyun-Soo Kim; Sung-Kyu Choi; Jong-Sun Rew; Sei-Jong Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy evaluation of combining gastroscopy, multi-slice spiral CT, Her-2, and tumor markers in gastric cancer staging diagnosis.

Authors:  Songbo Zhao; Yangang Bi; Zhenfang Wang; Fantao Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yongyun Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.