Literature DB >> 22615017

Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Ivana Dzeletovic1, M Edwyn Harrison, Shabana F Pasha, Michael D Crowell, G Anton Decker, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Jonathan A Leighton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy fails to achieve cecal intubation in 5-10 % of cases. Many of these cases can be completed using balloon-assisted colonoscopy, either with the single-balloon colonoscopy (SBC) or the double-balloon colonoscopy (DBC) techniques. AIM: To compare the completion rates of SBC and DBC in patients with previous incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
METHODS: Between August 2009 and July 2011 either SBC or DBC was performed in 53 patients in whom previous conventional colonoscopy did not achieve cecal intubation. The medical records of these 53 patients were reviewed retrospectively for details regarding (1) indication for the initial colonoscopy, (2) patient characteristics, (3) data from the initial colonoscopy, and (4) details on both SBC and DBC.
RESULTS: SBC was successful in intubating the cecum in 100 % (26/26) of patients and DBC was successful in 93 % (25/27) of patients. The median (range) time to reach the cecum was 17 (9-43) min in the SBC group and 20 (7-58) min in the DBC group (P = 0.37). The presence of polyps was an entirely new finding in 35 % (9/26) of patients in the SBC group and 30 % (8/27) of patients in DBC group. Therapeutics were performed in 73 % (19/26) of patients in SBC group and 67 % (18/27) of patients in DBC group.
CONCLUSION: For patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy, SBC and DBC offer high cecal intubation rates as well as detection of additional polyps and therapeutic capability. Either SBC or DBC can be considered after incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615017     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2227-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

1.  Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Brody W Goodwine
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yuuichi Takahashi; Hideaki Tanaka; Mitsuyo Kinjo; Ken Sakumoto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope.

Authors:  T Kaltenbach; R Soetikno; S Friedland
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.088

7.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C R Messina; W Cohn; E Gottfried; S Ingber; G Bernstein; E Coman; J Polito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.

Authors:  John B Marshall; Rodney A Perez; Richard W Madsen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Kenjiro Yasuda; Kiyohito Tanaka; Koji Uno; Moose Ueda; Kasumi Sanada; Masatsugu Nakajima
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument.

Authors:  G Gay; M Delvaux
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  12 in total

1.  Double-Balloon Colonoscopy Has a Higher Cecal Intubation Rate Than Conventional Colonoscopy Using a Colon Simulator.

Authors:  Keijiro Sunada; Satoshi Shinozaki; Tomonori Yano; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Hirotsugu Sakamoto; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Single- versus double-balloon-assisted colonoscopy after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jun Uk Lim; Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Tutticci; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Alternatives to Incomplete Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicolas A Villa; Rahul Pannala; Shabana F Pasha; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-11

5.  Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Diana L Franco; Jonathan A Leighton; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

6.  Impact of an incomplete colonoscopy referral program on recommendations after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Annapoorani Veerappan; Sean T McCarthy; Vineel Kankanala; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  High success rate of repeat colonoscopy with standard endoscopes in patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Annapoorani Veerappan; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Factors Influencing Cecal Intubation Time during Retrograde Approach Single-Balloon Enteroscopy.

Authors:  Tzu-Ming Ou; Peng-Jen Chen; Yu-Lueng Shih; Meng-Ting Wang; Hsin-Hung Huang; Wei-Kuo Chang; Tsai-Yuan Hsieh; Tien-Yu Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Double-Balloon Endoscopy after Incomplete Colonoscopy and Its Comparison with Computed Tomography Colonography.

Authors:  Carlijn Hermans; Dennis van der Zee; Lennard Gilissen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  PillCamColon2 after incomplete colonoscopy - A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Peter Baltes; Marc Bota; Jörg Albert; Michael Philipper; Hans-Georg Hörster; Friedrich Hagenmüller; Ingo Steinbrück; Ralf Jakobs; Matthias Bechtler; Dirk Hartmann; Horst Neuhaus; Jean-Pierre Charton; Rupert Mayershofer; Horst Hohn; Thomas Rösch; Stefan Groth; Tanja Nowak; Peter Wohlmuth; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.