Literature DB >> 12021440

An improved hydrogen bond potential: impact on medium resolution protein structures.

Felcy Fabiola1, Richard Bertram, Andrei Korostelev, Michael S Chapman.   

Abstract

A new semi-empirical force field has been developed to describe hydrogen-bonding interactions with a directional component. The hydrogen bond potential supports two alternative target angles, motivated by the observation that carbonyl hydrogen bond acceptor angles have a bimodal distribution. It has been implemented as a module for a macromolecular refinement package to be combined with other force field terms in the stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecules. The parameters for the hydrogen bond potential were optimized to best fit crystallographic data from a number of protein structures. Refinement of medium-resolution structures with this additional restraint leads to improved structure, reducing both the free R-factor and over-fitting. However, the improvement is seen only when stringent hydrogen bond selection criteria are used. These findings highlight common misconceptions about hydrogen bonding in proteins, and provide explanations for why the explicit hydrogen bonding terms of some popular force field sets are often best switched off.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021440      PMCID: PMC2373622          DOI: 10.1110/ps.4890102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  31 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Hydrogen bond stereochemistry in protein structure and function.

Authors:  J A Ippolito; R S Alexander; D W Christianson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Rfree and the rfree ratio. I. Derivation of expected values of cross-validation residuals used in macromolecular least-squares refinement.

Authors:  I J Tickle; R A Laskowski; D S Moss
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1998-07-01

4.  Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals.

Authors:  A T Hagler; E Huler; S Lifson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1974-08-21       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Low-barrier hydrogen bonds and enzymic catalysis.

Authors:  W W Cleland; M M Kreevoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins.

Authors:  E N Baker; R E Hubbard
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Helix packing angle preferences.

Authors:  J U Bowie
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Structural and biochemical characterization of the GTPgammaS-, GDP.Pi-, and GDP-bound forms of a GTPase-deficient Gly42 --> Val mutant of Gialpha1.

Authors:  A S Raw; D E Coleman; A G Gilman; S R Sprang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins.

Authors:  D F Stickle; L G Presta; K A Dill; G D Rose
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A low-barrier hydrogen bond in the catalytic triad of serine proteases.

Authors:  P A Frey; S A Whitt; J B Tobin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  42 in total

1.  Coupling between the BLUF and EAL domains in the blue light-regulated phosphodiesterase BlrP1.

Authors:  Maria Khrenova; Tatiana Domratcheva; Bella Grigorenko; Alexander Nemukhin
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  Do all backbone polar groups in proteins form hydrogen bonds?

Authors:  Patrick J Fleming; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Critical assessment of quantum mechanics based energy restraints in protein crystal structure refinement.

Authors:  Ning Yu; Xue Li; Guanglei Cui; Seth A Hayik; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Michael Strong; Michael R Sawaya; Shuishu Wang; Martin Phillips; Duilio Cascio; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.

Authors:  Nikola Trbovic; Byungchan Kim; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01

6.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  How processing of aspartylphosphate is coupled to lumenal gating of the ion pathway in the calcium pump.

Authors:  Chikashi Toyoshima; Yoshiyuki Norimatsu; Shiho Iwasawa; Takeo Tsuda; Haruo Ogawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Force field bias in protein folding simulations.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Sanghyun Park; Benoît Roux; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Crystal structure of a Na+-bound Na+,K+-ATPase preceding the E1P state.

Authors:  Ryuta Kanai; Haruo Ogawa; Bente Vilsen; Flemming Cornelius; Chikashi Toyoshima
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  What are the current limits on determination of protonation state using neutron macromolecular crystallography?

Authors:  Dorothee Liebschner; Pavel V Afonine; Nigel W Moriarty; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.