Literature DB >> 1578199

Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast.

G A Lucas1, W Timberlake.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, access to a 0.15% saccharin solution was followed on alternating days by access to a 32% sucrose solution and the same saccharin solution. In Experiment 1, rats increased both intake of and preference for a flavored saccharin solution that predicted sucrose, but neither effect was found using a predictive odor cue alone. Experiment 2 replicated the predictive flavor results but showed suppression of saccharin intake when environmental cues predicted sucrose. When both flavor and environment predicted sucrose, saccharin intake did not change, but preference for the predictive flavor increased. Discriminative taste cues appear to facilitate the development of preference conditioning, but environmental cues favor negative anticipatory contrast effects. Also, preference conditioning and contrast may develop concurrently and compete for expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578199     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  8 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects.

Authors:  J D Dougan; J A Kuh; K L Vink
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Ralph Norgren; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

6.  Contexts control negative contrast and restrict the expression of flavor preference conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Food-associated cues alter forebrain functional connectivity as assessed with immediate early gene and proenkephalin expression.

Authors:  Craig A Schiltz; Quentin Z Bremer; Charles F Landry; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.

Authors:  Jessica Hayes; Celia Garau; Giulia Chiacchierini; Gonzalo P Urcelay; James E McCutcheon; John Apergis-Schoute
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.