Literature DB >> 12015620

Current attitudes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

C Mavrantonis1, S D Wexner, J J Nogueras, E G Weiss, F Potenti, A J Pikarsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we set out to examine the current attitudes among surgeons toward laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS).
METHODS: A total of 3628 questionnaires were sent to all North American members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS); 40% of the members of each society responded (B15 respondents).
RESULTS: Currently, 85% of the respondents perform laparoscopic surgery; LCS was performed by 48% of the respondents in 21% of their patients. Although 35% of the members of SAGES have increased the number of laparoscopic colorectal operations they perform in the last 3 years, only 26% of ASCRS members did so. Our findings showed that 74% of the surgeons who perform LCS do so for diverticular disease, 68% for colonic polyps, 61% for villous adenoma, and 36% for ileal Crohn's disease. However, only 15% operate for the cure of carcinoma of any stage (16% of SAGES members and 11% of ASCRS members), whereas 8.5% and 7% operate for the cure of all upper and lower rectal carcinomas, respectively. Thirty-six percent of the surgeons who perform LCS for cancer have done between one and 10 curative resections, 8% have done 11-20 procedures, and 14% have done >20 procedures. There were 80 cases of port site recurrence reported by 4.4% of surgeons. Although 56% of the respondents would themselves undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery for a rectal villous adenoma, only 9% would do so for a distal-third rectal carcinoma (12% of SAGES and 5% of ASCRS respondents).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall percentage of respondents performing LCS has decreased over the last 3 years; moreover, surgeons are more hesitant to perform laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colonic cancer. Due to the overall low response rate, the fact that 4.4% of those surgeons who did respond have seen port site recurrences does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the prevalence of this problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12015620     DOI: 10.1007/s004640080072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Minimally invasive surgery and the economics of it. Can minimally invasive surgery be cost efficient from a business point of view?].

Authors:  J P Ritz; M Stufler; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: why it is still not the gold standard and why it should be.

Authors:  G Romano; G Gagliardi; F Bianco; M C Parker; F Corcione
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Laparoscopic approaches to rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

5.  The adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Husein Moloo; Fatima Haggar; Guillaume Martel; Jeremy Grimshaw; Doug Coyle; Ian D Graham; Elham Sabri; Eric C Poulin; Joseph Mamazza; Fady K Balaa; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Munir Ahmad Rathore; Mirza Khurrum Baig; Parv Sains
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-10

7.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Z-G Zhou; M Hu; Y Li; W-Z Lei; Y-Y Yu; Z Cheng; L Li; Y Shu; T-C Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease at academic medical centers.

Authors:  Marcelo W Hinojosa; Zuri A Murrell; Viken R Konyalian; Steven Mills; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Adil Ahamd; William Fa Miles; Mirza Khurrum Baig
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

10.  Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: does weight matter?

Authors:  Jorge Canedo; Rodrigo A Pinto; Sthela Regadas; F Sergio P Regadas; Lester Rosen; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.