Literature DB >> 20011205

Laparoscopic approaches to rectal cancer.

Bradley J Champagne1, Conor P Delaney.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven oncologically equivalent to conventional surgery and is now generally agreed to offer patients a reduced length of stay, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmesis. In contrast, acceptance of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer has been much delayed and the enthusiasm of early studies has met considerable skepticism. For rectal cancer, it has been demonstrated that there is considerable variation between surgeons in disease-free survival and local pelvic recurrence after open proctectomy for rectal cancer. These differences are likely to be magnified when the technical challenge of laparoscopy is added to proctectomy. Minimally invasive approaches to rectal cancer need to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes and maintenance or improvement in quality of life. This review will outline the current evidence for laparoscopy as a treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, emphasize the need for standardized approaches among multidisciplinary teams, and highlight the technical details of different laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; approaches; rectal cancer; techniques

Year:  2007        PMID: 20011205      PMCID: PMC2789505          DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-984868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  50 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Diagnostic laparoscopy prior to planned hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Stephen R Grobmyer; Yuman Fong; Michael D'Angelica; Ronald P Dematteo; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-12

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; B Lelong; C Laurent; V Moutardier; A Rullier; G Monges; J-R Delpero; E Rullier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Does laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum compromise long-term survival?

Authors:  Richard P Baker; Emma E White; Liviu Titu; Graeme S Duthie; Peter W R Lee; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations.

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Conor P Delaney; Anthony J Senagore; Bruce L Millward; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-01

10.  Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Anthuber; Alois Fuerst; Florian Elser; Rita Berger; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  6 in total

1.  The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Rodrigo Pedraza; Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez; Jean Paul LeFave; Ali Mahmood; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Sergio Ibarra; Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez; Oscar Moreno Ponte; Nisreen Madhoun; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Safety with Innovation in Colon and Rectal Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Christina N Jenkins
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

Review 4.  Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Allison Weaver; Scott Steele
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

5.  Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carly R Richards; Scott R Steele; Michael B Lustik; Suzanne M Gillern; Robert B Lim; Justin T Brady; Ali R Althans; Andrew T Schlussel
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-20

6.  A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Si Yu; Yong Ji; Tedong Luo; Pengjie Xu; Zuojun Zhen; Jianzhong Deng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.