Literature DB >> 11992247

A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution.

Arthur L Beaudet1, Yong-Hui Jiang.   

Abstract

The evolutionary advantages of genomic imprinting are puzzling. We propose that genomic imprinting evolved as a mechanism that maximizes the interindividual variability in the rates of gene expression for dosage-sensitive loci that, with minimal unrelated deleterious effects, can alter the phenotype over a wide continuum. We hypothesize (1) that genomic imprinting provides a previously suggested haploid selective advantage (HSA); (2) that many imprinted genes have evolved mechanisms that facilitate quantitative hypervariability (QH) of gene expression; (3) that the combination of HSA and QH makes possible a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution (IDE) that can mediate changes in phenotype; and (4) that this enhanced adaptability to a changing environment provides selective advantage to the population, as an assisted form of evolution. These mechanisms may have provided at least one of the driving forces for the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. The rheostat model suggests that both genetic and epigenetic variants can contribute to an integrated mechanism of mixed Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance and suggests the possibility that the majority of variants are not intrinsically deleterious but, depending on the environment, are each potentially advantageous. Moreover, this would be a reversible form of evolution, with the ability not only to protect a silent allele from selection for many generations but to reactivate and expand it in the population quickly.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992247      PMCID: PMC379123          DOI: 10.1086/340969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  50 in total

1.  Genetics. Was Lamarck just a little bit right?

Authors:  M Balter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reactivation of heritably silenced gene expression in mice.

Authors:  H G Sutherland; M Kearns; H D Morgan; A P Headley; C Morris; D I Martin; E Whitelaw
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  But yeast prion offers clues about evolution.

Authors:  S Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Results may not fit well with current theories...

Authors:  G Dover
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Transcriptional control: imprinting insulation.

Authors:  A P Wolffe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene.

Authors:  A C Bell; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus.

Authors:  A T Hark; C J Schoenherr; D J Katz; R S Ingram; J M Levorse; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity.

Authors:  H L True; S L Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse.

Authors:  H D Morgan; H G Sutherland; D I Martin; E Whitelaw
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms for CMT1A duplication and HNPP deletion.

Authors:  C F Boerkoel; K Inoue; L T Reiter; L E Warner; J R Lupski
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development.

Authors:  Brian P Dilkes; Luca Comai
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines.

Authors:  James A Birchler; Reiner A Veitia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role for tissue-dependent methylation differences in the expression of FOXE1 in nontumoral thyroid glands.

Authors:  Rasha Abu-Khudir; Fabien Magne; Jean-Pierre Chanoine; Cheri Deal; Guy Van Vliet; Johnny Deladoëy
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution.

Authors:  James A Birchler; Reiner A Veitia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Dietary alleviation of maternal obesity and diabetes: increased resistance to diet-induced obesity transcriptional and epigenetic signatures.

Authors:  Linda Attig; Alexandre Vigé; Anne Gabory; Moshen Karimi; Aurore Beauger; Marie-Sylvie Gross; Anne Athias; Catherine Gallou-Kabani; Philippe Gambert; Tomas J Ekstrom; Jean-Philippe Jais; Claudine Junien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Imprinted genes that regulate early mammalian growth are coexpressed in somatic stem cells.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Kuanyin K Lin; Corinne Sonnet; Nathan C Boles; David C Weksberg; Hoang Nguyen; Lowenna J Holt; Danny Rickwood; Roger J Daly; Margaret A Goodell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Network of Regulations by Small Non-Coding RNAs: The P-TEFb Kinase in Development and Pathology.

Authors:  Hossein Ghanbarian; Valérie Grandjean; François Cuzin; Minoo Rassoulzadegan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Empirical testing of hypotheses about the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals.

Authors:  David G Ashbrook; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Pharmacologic reversion of epigenetic silencing of the PRKD1 promoter blocks breast tumor cell invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  Sahra Borges; Heike Döppler; Edith A Perez; Cathy A Andorfer; Zhifu Sun; Panos Z Anastasiadis; E Thompson; Xochiquetzal J Geiger; Peter Storz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Interploidy hybridization barrier of endosperm as a dosage interaction.

Authors:  James A Birchler
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.