Literature DB >> 11992023

Difference in mechanical atrioventricular delay between atrial sensing and atrial pacing modes in patients with hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy: an electrical hemodynamic catheterization study.

Yong-Mei Cha1, Rick A Nishimura, David L Hayes.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: For optimal pacemaker programming in patients with cardiomyopathy, it is important to understand the relationship between the programmed right atrial and ventricular delay and the mechanical contraction delay of the left atrium and left ventricle.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 34 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (14) or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (20) who had dual-chamber P-synchronous pacing (VDD) and atrioventricular sequential pacing (DVI) during hemodynamic catheterization. Using multiple atrioventricular intervals during VDD and DVI pacing, the relationship of the programmed right atrial-right ventricular interval to the mechanical left atrial-left ventricular delay (assessed by high-fidelity pressures) was determined.
RESULTS: We found that the optimal mechanical left atrial-left ventricular delay was 120 ms, which required a programmed right atrial-right ventricular interval of 160 ms during DVI pacing. Also, the mean difference in right atrial-right ventricular pacing interval between VDD and DVI modes was 54 +/- 28 ms (range, 10-120 ms) in the hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy group and 64 +/- 38 ms (range, 20-150 ms) in the dilated cardiomyopathy group.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the optimal right atrial-right ventricular interval during DVI pacing was 160 ms and that, to achieve the same mechanical left atrial-left ventricular delay, the programmed right atrial-right ventricular interval during VDD pacing was approximately 50 ms to 60 ms shorter than during DVI pacing. However, the difference of electrical atrioventricular pacing interval in VDD and DVI may vary widely from patient to patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992023     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015311416232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  19 in total

1.  Dynamic function of atrial contraction in regulation of cardiac performance.

Authors:  S K BROCKMAN
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1963-04

2.  HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ALTERING THE TIMING OF ATRIAL SYSTOLE.

Authors:  N S SKINNER; J H MITCHELL; A G WALLACE; S J SARNOFF
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1963-09

3.  Influence of atrial contraction and relaxation on closure of mitral valve. Observations on effects of autonomic nerve activity.

Authors:  S J SARNOFF; J P GILMORE; J H MITCHELL
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  M-mode echocardiograms for determination of optimal left atrial timing in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.

Authors:  M Wish; J S Gottdiener; A I Cohen; R D Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakers.

Authors:  M Wish; R D Fletcher; J S Gottdiener; A I Cohen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Noninvasive measurement of rate of left ventricular relaxation by Doppler echocardiography. Validation with simultaneous cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; R S Schwartz; A J Tajik; D R Holmes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Failure of calcium channel blockers to improve ventricular relaxation in humans.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; R S Schwartz; D R Holmes; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing.

Authors:  D L Janosik; A C Pearson; T A Buckingham; A J Labovitz; R M Redd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Atrio-ventricular and ventriculo-atrial conduction times in patients undergoing pacemaker implant.

Authors:  D L Hayes; S Furman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Long-term efficacy of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of end-stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M Hochleitner; H Hörtnagl; H Hörtnagl; L Fridrich; F Gschnitzer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of atrioventricular conduction prolongation on optimization of paced atrioventricular delay for biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Santos E Cabreriza; Lauren N Bedrosian; Suzanne R Karl; Marc E Richmond; T Alexander Quinn; Bin Cheng; Henry M Spotnitz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Imaging of myocardial dyssynchrony in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Boaz D Rosen; Albert C Lardo; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Optimized temporary biventricular pacing acutely improves intraoperative cardiac output after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass: a substudy of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel Y Wang; Marc E Richmond; T Alexander Quinn; Ajay J Mirani; Alexander Rusanov; Vinay Yalamanchi; Alan D Weinberg; Santos E Cabreriza; Henry M Spotnitz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial-pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT.

Authors:  Andreas Kyriacou; Christopher A Rajkumar; Punam A Pabari; S M Afzal Sohaib; Keith Willson; Nicholas S Peters; Phang B Lim; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Zachary I Whinnett; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.976

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.