OBJECTIVE:Permanent biventricular pacing benefits patients with heart failure and interventricular conduction delay, but the importance of pacing with and without optimization in patients at risk of low cardiac output after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that pacing parameters independently affect cardiac output. Accordingly, we analyzed aortic flow measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter in patients at risk of low cardiac output during an ongoing randomized clinical trial of biventricular pacing (n = 11) versus standard of care (n = 9). METHODS: A substudy was conducted in all 20 patients in both groups with stable pacing after coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or both. Ejection fraction averaged 33% ± 15%, and QRS duration was 116 ± 19 ms. Effects were measured within 1 hour of the conclusion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Atrioventricular delay (7 settings) and interventricular delay (9 settings) were optimized in random sequence. RESULTS: Optimization of atrioventricular delay (171 ± 8 ms) at an interventricular delay of 0 ms increased flow by 14% versus the worst setting (111 ± 11 ms, P < .001) and 7% versus nominal atrioventricular delay (120 ms, P < .001). Interventricular delay optimization increased flow 10% versus the worst setting (P < .001) and 5% versus nominal interventricular delay (0 ms, P < .001). Optimized pacing increased cardiac output 13% versus atrial pacing at matched heart rate (5.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.9 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .003) and 10% versus sinus rhythm (5.0 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .019). CONCLUSIONS:Temporary biventricular pacing increases intraoperative cardiac output in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization maximizes this benefit.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Permanent biventricular pacing benefits patients with heart failure and interventricular conduction delay, but the importance of pacing with and without optimization in patients at risk of low cardiac output after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that pacing parameters independently affect cardiac output. Accordingly, we analyzed aortic flow measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter in patients at risk of low cardiac output during an ongoing randomized clinical trial of biventricular pacing (n = 11) versus standard of care (n = 9). METHODS: A substudy was conducted in all 20 patients in both groups with stable pacing after coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or both. Ejection fraction averaged 33% ± 15%, and QRS duration was 116 ± 19 ms. Effects were measured within 1 hour of the conclusion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Atrioventricular delay (7 settings) and interventricular delay (9 settings) were optimized in random sequence. RESULTS: Optimization of atrioventricular delay (171 ± 8 ms) at an interventricular delay of 0 ms increased flow by 14% versus the worst setting (111 ± 11 ms, P < .001) and 7% versus nominal atrioventricular delay (120 ms, P < .001). Interventricular delay optimization increased flow 10% versus the worst setting (P < .001) and 5% versus nominal interventricular delay (0 ms, P < .001). Optimized pacing increased cardiac output 13% versus atrial pacing at matched heart rate (5.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.9 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .003) and 10% versus sinus rhythm (5.0 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary biventricular pacing increases intraoperative cardiac output in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization maximizes this benefit.
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Stellbrink; O A Breithardt; A Franke; S Sack; P Bakker; A Auricchio; T Pochet; R Salo; A Kramer; J Spinelli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Cazeau; C Leclercq; T Lavergne; S Walker; C Varma; C Linde; S Garrigue; L Kappenberger; G A Haywood; M Santini; C Bailleul; J C Daubert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David G Rabkin; Santos E Cabreriza; Lauren J Curtis; Sean P Mazer; Josh P Kanter; Alan D Weinberg; Allan J Hordof; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: A L A J Dekker; B Phelps; B Dijkman; T van der Nagel; F H van der Veen; G G Geskes; J G Maessen Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: T Alexander Quinn; Santos E Cabreriza; Marc E Richmond; Alan D Weinberg; Jeffrey W Holmes; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Santos E Cabreriza; Lauren N Bedrosian; Suzanne R Karl; Marc E Richmond; T Alexander Quinn; Bin Cheng; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Erin M George; Santos E Cabreriza; T Alexander Quinn; Alexander Rusanov; Rabin Gerrah; Justin M Broyles; Alan D Weinberg; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Robin M Brusen; Rebecca Hahn; Santos E Cabreriza; Bin Cheng; Daniel Y Wang; Wanda Truong; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Matthew E Spotnitz; Marc E Richmond; Thomas Alexander Quinn; Santos E Cabreriza; Daniel Y Wang; Catherine M Albright; Alan D Weinberg; José M Dizon; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Casey Wong; Santos E Cabreriza; Maria Nugent; Daniel Y Wang; Rabin Gerrah; Alexander Rusanov; Vinay Yalamanchi; Alice Wang; Bin Cheng; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Alice Wang; Santos E Cabreriza; Bin Cheng; Jack S Shanewise; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Christopher K Johnson; Santos E Cabreriza; Rana L Sahar; Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Bin Cheng; Mira S Gendy; T Alexander Quinn; Henry Michael Spotnitz Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Huy V Nguyen; Vinod Havalad; Linda Aponte-Patel; Alexandra Y Murata; Daniel Y Wang; Alexander Rusanov; Bin Cheng; Santos E Cabreriza; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Henry M Spotnitz; Santos E Cabreriza; Daniel Y Wang; T Alexander Quinn; Bin Cheng; Lauren N Bedrosian; Linda Aponte-Patel; Craig R Smith Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 4.330