Literature DB >> 11687314

Evaluation of the upgraded amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (gen-probe) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and non-respiratory specimens.

L Alcalá1, M J Ruiz-Serrano, S Hernangómez, M Marín, D García de Viedma, R San Juan, E Bouza.   

Abstract

We evaluated the upgraded Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test kit (AMTD) (Gen-Probe Inc.) for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and non-respiratory specimens, and compared the results between the traditional 30,000 RLUs cutoff criteria (C) and three equivocal ranges (30,000-100,000, R1; 30,000-500,000, R2; and 30,000-1,000,000, R3). We tested 663 respiratory and 238 non-respiratory samples from 464 patients. The gold standard was considered to be the combination of culture and clinical data. One hundred and nineteen samples were from 56 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, and 36 samples were from 19 patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. When C criteria was applied, the sensitivity and specificity values were 90.8 and 93.0% for respiratory specimens, while they were 88.9 and 92.1% for non-respiratory specimens (p = NS). The sensitivity was significantly higher in smear-positive specimens (96.7%) than in smear-negative ones (81.0%) (p < 0.05). When compared with C criteria, the overall sensitivity was maintained at 90.3% for R1 criteria, and slightly decreased to 89.7% for R2 and R3 criteria (p = NS). Overall, specificity increased significantly from 92.9% (C) to 97.5% (R1), 99.1% (R2), and 99.2% (R3). Application of R2 or R3 criteria improved significantly the specificity of the test with little decrease in sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687314     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00279-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

Review 1.  Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.

Authors:  Claudio Piersimoni; Claudio Scarparo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Greco; E Girardi; A Navarra; C Saltini
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  False-negative results obtained with the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test caused by unrecognized inhibition of the amplification reaction.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Mary Jane Ferraro; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of two molecular methods for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Manuel Causse; Pilar Ruiz; Juan Bautista Gutiérrez-Aroca; Manuel Casal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of equivocal zone in interpretation of results of the amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Authors:  A Kerleguer; J-L Koeck; M Fabre; P Gérôme; R Teyssou; V Hervé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test by using respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens in a tertiary care center laboratory.

Authors:  Cathal E O'Sullivan; David R Miller; Peggy S Schneider; Glenn D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical evaluation of the gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis.

Authors:  A Kerleguer; M Fabre; J J Bernatas; P Gerome; E Nicand; V Herve; J L Koeck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Interpreting the results of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of M. tuberculosis rRNA.

Authors:  Andrew M Middleton; Paul Cullinan; Robert Wilson; Jonathan R Kerr; Maureen V Chadwick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Methods for rapid diagnosis of meningitis etiology in adults.

Authors:  Victoria Poplin; David R Boulware; Nathan C Bahr
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.851

10.  Commercial nucleic-acid amplification tests for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Daphne I Ling; Laura L Flores; Lee W Riley; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.