Literature DB >> 11972192

Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

S Mahmud1, M Masaud, K Canna, A H M Nassar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fundus-first dissection (FFD) is an established technique to deal with difficult open cholecystectomies. Although the indications for such an approach are similar for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), FFD is not widely practiced because of difficulties that arise with liver retraction, the dissection of dense adhesions, or obscured cystic pedicles, often necessitating conversion to an open procedure.
METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for FFD and the technical aspects of the procedure in cases with a difficult cystic pedicle. Prospectively collected data and video recordings of cases of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FFLC) were analyzed. The great majority were difficult cases, so we also reviewed the safety aspects of this approach and assessed its effect on the conversion rate.
RESULTS: FFLC was resorted to in 35 cases (5%) of 710 consecutive LCs with difficulty grade II (two cases), III (13 cases), or IV (20 cases). There were 16 male patients (46% vs 9% males in the whole), and the mean age was 56 years (ranges, 28-87). The reasons for FFD were dense adhesions preventing the exposure of the cystic pedicle in 14 cases, large Hartmann's pouch stones in 10 cases, short dilated cystic ducts in six cases, and Mirizzi syndrome in three cases. Two cases had contracted "burn-out" gallbladders. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was possible in 24 patients, failed in 10 (29%), and was not attemped in one. Seven patients had bile duct stones and required bile duct exploration. FFLC was completed in 31 patients, 28 of whom were seriously considered for conversion prior to commencing FFD. Conversion was still necessary after trial FFD in four cases (11%) two with Mirizzi abnormalities, one with bile duct stones, and one with dense adhesions. The mean operative time was 125 min, (range, 50-230). There were no operative or technique-related complications.
CONCLUSION: FFLC is feasible and is a safe option for cases with a difficult cystic pedicle. Its use reduced the conversion rate of the series from a potential 5.2% to 1.2%, However, subtotal cholecystectomy or conversion must not be delayed if, after the neck of the gallbladder is reached the anatomy is still unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11972192     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9094-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of risk factors for predicting conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Parra Blanco; J Bueno López; C Madrazo Leal; C Fariñas Alvarez; F Torre Carrasco; M C Fariñas
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of the reasons for a conversion to conventional surgery in an elective surgery department].

Authors:  F P Mattioli; A Cagnazzo; F Razzetta; C Bianchi; E Varaldo; A Campagna; A Percivale
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The significance of cystic duct stones encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Mahmud; Y Hamza; A H Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C M Lo; S T Fan; C L Liu; E C Lai; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  [Laparoscopy or laparotomy in acute cholecystitis (200 cases). Comparison of the results and factors predictive of conversion].

Authors:  J P Araujo-Teixeira; J Rocha-Reis; A Costa-Cabral; H Barros; A C Saraiva; A M Araujo-Teixeira
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1999-11

6.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Koperna; M Kisser; F Schulz
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

8.  Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I G Martin; S P Dexter; J Marton; J Gibson; J Asker; A Firullo; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G M Fried; J S Barkun; H H Sigman; L Joseph; D Clas; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; R Croxford; S M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  17 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Hongyi Cui; John J Kelly; Demetrius E M Litwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the one-incision three-trocar technique with all straight instruments: how I do it?

Authors:  Hongyi Cui
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  [Typical intraoperative complications in laparoscopic surgery].

Authors:  F Köckerling; S Grund; D A Jacob
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Mirizzi syndrome.

Authors:  Sushil K Ahlawat; Rohit Singhania; Firas H Al-Kawas
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04

5.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex gallstone disease: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Lai-Gen Shen; He-Ming Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Yuji Shingu; Shunichiro Komatsu; Shinji Norimizu; Yoshiro Taguchi; Eiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael D Kelly
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery.

Authors:  A H Hamouda; W Goh; S Mahmud; M Khan; A H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Antegrade dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Neri; Antonio Ambrosi; Alberto Fersini; Nicola Tartaglia; Tiziano Pio Valentino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Predictive Factors for Long Operative Duration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography for Combined Choledochocystolithiasis.

Authors:  Ryukyung Lee; Heontak Ha; Young Seok Han; Min Kyu Jung; Jae Min Chun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.