Literature DB >> 22083322

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Hongyi Cui1, John J Kelly, Demetrius E M Litwin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) may increase the risk of bile duct injury due to compromised operative exposure. Dome-down laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides the ability to evaluate the cystic duct circumferentially prior to its division, thus minimizing the risks of bile duct injury. This study assesses the feasibility and safety of SILC using a modified dome-down approach with all conventional laparoscopic instruments.
METHODS: Three low-profile 5-mm trocars are placed via a single transumbilical incision. The two working trocars are aimed laterally via the rectus to achieve adequate triangulation. An extralong 5-mm 30º laparoscope with an L-shaped light-cord adaptor is used to yield more external working space. Cephalic liver retraction is achieved with one transabdominal suture through the gallbladder fundus. Leaving the gallbladder fundus attached to the liver bed, a window is first created between the gallbladder body and the liver. The dissection is then carried down retrograde toward the porta hepatis. A 360º view of the gallbladder-cystic duct junction is achieved prior to transecting the cystic duct. The gallbladder is then freed by separation of the fundal attachments. The specimen is retrieved by enlarging the fascial incision. All fascial defects are then primarily closed.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 31 years, mean BMI 26.3 kg/m(2)) were enrolled in this study. Thirteen had elective surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis, and three had emergency surgery for acute cholecystitis. Mean operating time was 80.3 min, and blood loss was minimal. All patients were discharged within 24 h without complications. Follow-up at 1 month revealed a barely visible scar within the umbilicus.
CONCLUSIONS: SILC using a modified dome-down approach is technically feasible with all straight instruments, and it is safe because of good delineation of ductal anatomy. Adoption of this approach may minimize the risk of bile duct injury during early experience of SILC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083322     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1985-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Limits and advantages of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned.

Authors:  Massimiliano Tuveri; Pietro G Calò; Fabio Medas; Augusto Tuveri; Angelo Nicolosi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; David B Earle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Scott R Philipp; Brent W Miedema; Klaus Thaler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve.

Authors:  Daniel Solomon; Robert L Bell; Andrew J Duffy; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Mahmud; M Masaud; K Canna; A H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach.

Authors:  Erica R Podolsky; Steven J Rottman; Honesto Poblete; Stephanie A King; Paul G Curcillo
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.688

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the one-incision three-trocar technique with all straight instruments: how I do it?

Authors:  Hongyi Cui
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  A comparison of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an alternative technique without a suspension suture.

Authors:  Barlas Sülü; Tülay Diken; Hasan Altun; Turgut Anuk; Bülent Güvendi; Elif İlingi; Musa Sinan Eren; Yusuf Günerhan; Neşet Köksal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-12-01

3.  Evolution of SILS Cholecystectomy in the Caribbean: The Direct Transfascial Puncture Technique Using Conventional Instruments without Working Ports.

Authors:  Shamir O Cawich; Dexter Thomas; Dale Hassranah; Vijay Naraynsingh
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2014-10-02

4.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions.

Authors:  Kuan-Ju Huang; Kuan-Ting Lin; Chin-Jui Wu; Ying-Xuan Li; Wen-Chun Chang; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.