Michael D Kelly1. 1. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK. mk@mdkelly.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation. METHODS: A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle. RESULTS: 1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon.
BACKGROUND: Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation. METHODS: A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle. RESULTS: 1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon.
Authors: L Ansaloni; M Pisano; F Coccolini; A B Peitzmann; A Fingerhut; F Catena; F Agresta; A Allegri; I Bailey; Z J Balogh; C Bendinelli; W Biffl; L Bonavina; G Borzellino; F Brunetti; C C Burlew; G Camapanelli; F C Campanile; M Ceresoli; O Chiara; I Civil; R Coimbra; M De Moya; S Di Saverio; G P Fraga; S Gupta; J Kashuk; M D Kelly; V Koka; H Jeekel; R Latifi; A Leppaniemi; R V Maier; I Marzi; F Moore; D Piazzalunga; B Sakakushev; M Sartelli; T Scalea; P F Stahel; K Taviloglu; G Tugnoli; S Uraneus; G C Velmahos; I Wani; D G Weber; P Viale; M Sugrue; R Ivatury; Y Kluger; K S Gurusamy; E E Moore Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Carlos Augusto Gomes; Cleber Soares Junior; Salomone Di Saverio; Massimo Sartelli; Michael Denis Kelly; Camila Couto Gomes; Felipe Couto Gomes; Lívia Dornellas Corrêa; Camila Brandão Alves; Samuel de Fádel Guimarães Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-05-27
Authors: Nicola Tartaglia; Pasquale Cianci; Alessandra Di Lascia; Alberto Fersini; Antonio Ambrosi; Vincenzo Neri Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2016-11-13