Literature DB >> 11969145

A scale to measure satisfaction of bereaved family receiving inpatient palliative care.

T Morita1, S Chihara, T Kashiwagi.   

Abstract

Although satisfaction is an important outcome of medical care, there are no validated tools to quantify family satisfaction with hospital-based palliative care. In this nationwide postal survey, an instrument to measure informal carer satisfaction with an inpatient palliative care service was validated. A 60-item questionnaire was mailed to 1344 bereaved people who had lost their family members at 50 palliative care units in Japan, and 850 responses were analysed (response rate = 64%). The reliability, construct validity, and convergent validity of the scale were examined after the responses were randomly divided into two groups: a training set used in the development phase (n = 500) and a testing set used in the validation phase (n = 350). The number of scale items was reduced from 50 to 34 through psychometric techniques in the development phase. In the testing sample, the overall Cronbach's coefficient alpha for the final 34-item scale was 0.98. A factor analysis revealed that the scale consisted of seven subcategories: Nursing Care, Facility, Information, Availability, Family Care, Cost, and Symptom Palliation. The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with the degree of global satisfaction of the bereaved (Spearman's rho = 0.78). In conclusion, this 34-item scale, the Satisfaction Scale for Family Members Receiving Inpatient Palliative Care (Sat-Fam-IPC), has acceptable psychometric properties and would be a useful tool to measure carer satisfaction with an inpatient palliative care service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11969145     DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm514oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  10 in total

1.  Multiprofessional team approach in palliative care units in Japan.

Authors:  Etsuko Maeyama; Masako Kawa; Mitsunori Miyashita; Taketoshi Ozawa; Noriko Futami; Yuriko Nakagami; Chieko Sugishita; Keiko Kazuma
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Measuring Experience With End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jessica Penn Lendon; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Oluwatobi A Oluwatola; Rebecca Anhang Price; Denise Quigley; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Use of an Item Bank to Develop Two Short-Form FAMCARE Scales to Measure Family Satisfaction With Care in the Setting of Serious Illness.

Authors:  Katherine A Ornstein; Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Mildred Ramirez; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Albert L Siu
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Performance of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE) measure in an ethnically diverse cohort: psychometric analyses using item response theory.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katherine Ornstein; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Mildred Ramirez; Albert Siu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Development the Care Evaluation Scale Version 2.0: a modified version of a measure for bereaved family members to evaluate the structure and process of palliative care for cancer patient.

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyashita; Maho Aoyama; Misato Nakahata; Yuji Yamada; Mutsumi Abe; Kazuhiro Yanagihara; Akemi Shirado; Mariko Shutoh; Yoshiaki Okamoto; Jun Hamano; Aoi Miyamoto; Saki Yoshida; Kazuki Sato; Kei Hirai; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  The Japan hospice and palliative evaluation study 4: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kento Masukawa; Maho Aoyama; Tatsuya Morita; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Satoru Tsuneto; Yasuo Shima; Mitsunori Miyashita
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  The quality of care of the dying in hospital-next-of-kin perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Heckel; Annika R Vogt; Stephanie Stiel; Johannes Radon; Sandra Kurkowski; Swantje Goebel; Christoph Ostgathe; Martin Weber
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the CANHELP Lite Bereavement Questionnaire.

Authors:  Alexandra Pereira; Amélia Ferreira; Ana Rita Abrantes; Cristiana Gomes; Joana Saraiva; Laetitia Teixeira; Daren K Heyland; José Martins; Sara Pinto; Olga Fernandes
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-02

9.  Preferences on advance care planning and end-of-life care in patients hospitalized for heart failure.

Authors:  Hiroki Kitakata; Takashi Kohno; Shun Kohsaka; Daisuke Fujisawa; Naomi Nakano; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Yoshinori Katsumata; Yuji Nagatomo; Shinsuke Yuasa; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-04

10.  Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Nuriye Kupeli; Bridget Candy; Gabrielle Tamura-Rose; Guy Schofield; Natalie Webber; Stephanie E Hicks; Theodore Floyd; Bella Vivat; Elizabeth L Sampson; Patrick Stone; Trefor Aspden
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.