Literature DB >> 11954702

Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing.

D Lacroix1, P J Prendergast, G Li, D Marsh.   

Abstract

Bone regeneration is a common biological process occurring, for example, during fracture healing or osseo-integration of prostheses. Computer simulation of bone regeneration is difficult to carry out because it is a complex sequence of cell-mediated processes regulated by mechanobiological stimuli. An algorithm to predict the time-course of intramembranous and endochondral ossification has been developed. The algorithm assumes that there are precursor cells in the undifferentiated tissue and that these cells differentiate into either fibroblasts (to form fibrous connective tissue), chondrocytes (to form cartilaginous tissue) or osteoblasts (to form bone), based on a combination of biophysical stimuli derived from strain in the collagenous matrix and flow of the interstitial fluid. Both these stimuli are known to deform the precursor cells, and the authors hypothesise that this causes activation of cell differentiation pathways. The observation that precursor cells take time to spread throughout the fracture callus has been included in the algorithm. The algorithm was tested in an investigation of the fracture healing of a long bone using an axi-symmetric finite element model. The spatio-temporal sequence of tissue phenotypes that appear in the course of fracture healing was successfully simulated. Furthermore, the origin of the precursor cells (either surrounding muscle, bone marrow or periosteum) was predicted to have a fundamental effect on the healing pattern and on the rate of reduction of the interfragmentary strain (IFS). The initial IFS = 0.15 drops to 0.01 within seven iterations if cells originated from the surrounding soft tissue, but took more than 50% longer if cells originated in the inner cambium layer of the periosteum, and four times longer if precursor cells originated from the bone marrow only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11954702     DOI: 10.1007/bf02347690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

Review 1.  Bone poroelasticity.

Authors:  S C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems.

Authors:  P J Prendergast; W D van Driel; J H Kuiper
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 3.  The role of osteochondral progenitor cells in fracture repair.

Authors:  J U Yoo; B Johnstone
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A mathematical model for fibro-proliferative wound healing disorders.

Authors:  L Olsen; J A Sherratt; P K Maini
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  The biology of fracture healing in long bones.

Authors:  B McKibbin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1978-05

6.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments.

Authors:  V C Mow; S C Kuei; W M Lai; C G Armstrong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement.

Authors:  R Y Hori; J L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1982-11

8.  Analysis of intracellular osteopontin as a marker of osteoblastic cell differentiation and mesenchymal cell migration.

Authors:  R Zohar; S Cheifetz; C A McCulloch; J Sodek
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 9.  Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation.

Authors:  S M Perren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing.

Authors:  D R Carter; P R Blenman; G S Beaupré
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  35 in total

1.  Temporal evolution of skeletal regenerated tissue: what can mechanical investigation add to biological?

Authors:  Remy Casanova; Didier Moukoko; Martine Pithioux; Cyril Pailler-Mattéi; Hassan Zahouani; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Bone Homeostasis and Repair: Forced Into Shape.

Authors:  Alesha B Castillo; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Prediction of fracture healing under axial loading, shear loading and bending is possible using distortional and dilatational strains as determining mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Malte Steiner; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Frank Niemeyer; Ulrich Simon; Tim Wehner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Effects of compressive residual stress on the morphologic changes of fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shu-Li Lin; Jen-Chang Yang; Kuo-Ning Ho; Chau-Hsiang Wang; Chien-Wu Yeh; Haw-Ming Huang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Robert Carrera; Vittoria Flamini; Lena Kenny; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Benson M George; Daniel Hunter; Bo Liu; Gurpreet Singh; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Mann; Jill A Helms; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Physical stimulation of chondrogenic cells in vitro: a review.

Authors:  Sibylle Grad; David Eglin; Mauro Alini; Martin J Stoddart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Authors:  Jérôme Noailly; Luigi Ambrosio; K Elizabeth Tanner; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The connection between cellular mechanoregulation and tissue patterns during bone healing.

Authors:  Felix Repp; Andreas Vetter; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computational simulation methodologies for mechanobiological modelling: a cell-centred approach to neointima development in stents.

Authors:  C J Boyle; A B Lennon; M Early; D J Kelly; C Lally; P J Prendergast
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.