Literature DB >> 8688118

A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems.

P J Prendergast1, W D van Driel, J H Kuiper.   

Abstract

The extent to which three finite element codes can solve problems in biphasic poroelasticity is examined. Both linear and non-linear (that is where the permeability of the material is a function of deformation) formulations are studied using the standard confined compression problem as an example. The results are compared, where possible, to the results of Spilker, Suh and Mow who first presented a solution to this problem for cartilage. The agreement is excellent for the linear case. For the non-linear case, the solutions do differ slightly; however, the difference would not appear to be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8688118     DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_402_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  6 in total

1.  Loading and boundary condition influences in a poroelastic finite element model of cartilage stresses in a triaxial compression bioreactor.

Authors:  Nicole A Kallemeyn; Nicole M Grosland; Doug R Pedersen; James A Martin; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2006

2.  Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing.

Authors:  D Lacroix; P J Prendergast; G Li; D Marsh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  [Possibilities for the biomechanical characterization of cartilage: a brief update].

Authors:  C Hurschler; R Abedian
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems.

Authors:  Qingen Meng; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher; Ruth Wilcox
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers.

Authors:  André P G Castro; Jiang Yao; Tom Battisti; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 6.  Recent advances in computational mechanics of the human knee joint.

Authors:  M Kazemi; Y Dabiri; L P Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.