Literature DB >> 1194831

Differential reinforcement and signal detection.

J A Nevin, K Olson, C Mandell, P Yarensky.   

Abstract

Reinforcement was introduced for responses normally treated as errors in signal-detection procedures. The first experiment used a standard two-response discrete-trial procedure with no reinforcement for errors. Results showed that rats altered their response biases but maintained constant sensitivity to visual signals when reinforcement probabilities varied, and that their sensitivity depended on the physical difference between signals, in accordance with the predictions of signal-detection theory. Experiment II, with rats, and Experiment III, with pigeons, demonstrated that sensitivity decreased in this procedure when reinforcement was scheduled for errors with the signals held constant, despite independence of overall number of reinforcers and sensitivity. Experiment IV, with rats, replicated the decrease in sensitivity in a continuous procedure employing only one response. The decrements in sensitivity were similar across Experiments II, III, and IV, and accorded well with earlier research. Thus, contrary to a fundamental assumption of signal-detection theory, estimates of sensitivity are not always invariant with respect to the outcomes of responding, but depend on relative reinforcement of correct responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1194831      PMCID: PMC1333437          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Is there a sensory threshold?

Authors:  J A SWETS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

4.  Stimulus bias in the absence of food reinforcement.

Authors:  D G Lander
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the development of stimulus control.

Authors:  E G Heinemann; E Avin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Psychometric and psychophysical hue discrimination functions for the pigeon.

Authors:  A A Wright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Authors:  A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas.

Authors:  J B Grier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

Authors:  S Gallagher; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Applying signal-detection theory to the study of observer accuracy and bias in behavioral assessment.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Allison Tetreault; Alyson Hovanetz; Emily Bellaci; Jonathan Miller; Hilary Karp; Angela Mahmood; Maggie Strobel; Shelley Mullen; Alice Keyl; Alexis Toupard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

3.  Stimulus control and response bias in an analogue prey-detection procedure.

Authors:  P Voss; D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Delayed reinforcement and delayed choice in symbolic matching to sample: Effects on stimulus discriminability.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminability of fixed-ratio schedules for pigeons: effects of payoff values.

Authors:  S L Hobson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Bias in self-evaluation: Signal probability effects.

Authors:  T S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Stimulus Context and Reward Contingency Induce Behavioral Adaptation in a Rodent Tactile Detection Task.

Authors:  Christian Waiblinger; Caroline M Wu; Michael F Bolus; Peter Y Borden; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Adaptive criterion setting in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Maik C Stüttgen; Ali Yildiz; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.