Literature DB >> 11937117

Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients.

Michael Wilson1, Kathy Hartke, Michelle Kiehl, Jonetta Rodgers, Celeste Brabec, Rodney Lyles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using day-5 embryo transfer (ET) for all patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective, non-randomized comparison of day-3 ET versus day-5 ET.
SETTING: Private practice. PATIENT(S): Women having in vitro fertilization and receiving either day-3 ET or day-5 ET. INTERVENTION(S): Extended embryo culture through embryonic genome activation to select those embryos with higher implantation potential. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The following parameters were compared for day-3 ET and day-5 ET: clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, implantation rates, patients having cryopreservation, and liveborn rates. RESULT(S): Blastocyst embryo transfer (day-5 ET) increased the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate for patients <35 years of age and for the total program. The risk of high order multiple pregnancy was reduced by a decrease in the number of embryos transferred (2.0 vs. 2.7; day-5 ET vs. day-3 ET, respectively). However, the multiple pregnancy rate was not different due to an increase in the implantation rate (day-5 ET 43% vs. day-3 ET 27%). There was no difference in the percent of patients not having an ET (day-5 ET 2.8%; day-3 ET 1.3%). CONCLUSION(S): Blastocyst ET increased the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate for patients <35 years of age and for the total program, with a concomitant decrease in the number of embryos transferred. However, the decrease in the number of embryos transferred did not decrease the multiple rate, but did reduce the incidence of high order multiples. Most patients (97%) had an embryo transfer. Therefore, culturing embryos an additional 48 hours through embryonic genome activation allows for selection of the most viable embryos without compromising the patient's opportunity to become pregnant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11937117     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03235-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  The impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging-a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Anton Neyer; Martin Zintz; Astrid Stecher; Magnus Bach; Barbara Wirleitner; Nicolas H Zech; Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI.

Authors:  Martha Agnes Hentemann; Siri Briskemyr; Kjell Bertheussen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Rogério Bonassi Machado; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effect of ICSI on subsequent blastocyst development and pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Lynn M Westphal; Mary D Hinckley; Barry Behr; Amin A Milki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36.

Authors:  Fabrice Guerif; Malak Lemseffer; Milène Blanchard; Dominique Royere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Protein expression in human cumulus cells as an indicator of blastocyst formation and pregnancy success.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Edson Guimarães Lo Turco; Fernanda Bertuccez Cordeiro; Elaine Cristina Cabral; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Erika Ono; Rita Cássia Sávio Figueira; Marcos Nogueira Eberlin; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer.

Authors:  Amin A Milki; Sunny H Jun; Mary D Hinckley; Lynn W Westphal; Linda C Giudice; Barry Behr
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Comparison of the transfer of equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos after repeated failure of in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Meric Karacan; Murat Ulug; Ayse Arvas; Ziya Cebi; Munip Berberoglugil; Melike Batukan; Teksen Camlıbel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.