Literature DB >> 11929354

Return-to-work interventions for low back pain: a descriptive review of contents and concepts of working mechanisms.

J Bart Staal1, Hynek Hlobil, Maurits W van Tulder, Albère J A Köke, Tjabe Smid, Willem van Mechelen.   

Abstract

Low back pain is a major medical and social problem associated with disability, work absenteeism and high costs. Given the impact of the problem, there is a need for effective treatment interventions in occupational healthcare that aim at the prevention of chronic disability and the realisation of return to work. These so-called return-to-work (RTW) interventions are becoming increasingly popular. As well as questions concerning the effectiveness of RTW interventions, there are also important questions on the actual content and underlying concepts of these multifactorial intervention strategies. The purpose of this review is to examine the literature on the content and underlying concepts of RTW interventions for low back pain. A systematic literature search identified 14 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of 19 RTW interventions. The content and concepts of these RTW interventions are described, compared and discussed in this review. Further, the contents of the RTW interventions are classified by the use of predefined components (physical exercises, education, behavioural treatments and ergonomic measures). The identified RTW interventions varied with respect to the disciplines involved, the target population and the number and duration of sessions. The classification showed that physical exercises were a component of most of the selected interventions, followed by education, behavioural treatments and ergonomic measures. The most prevalent combination of components was the combination of physical exercises, behavioural treatment and education. However, the types of physical exercises, behavioural treatment and education varied widely among the RTW interventions. The described concepts for the physical exercises were an increase of muscle strength, coordination, range of motion of the spine and cardiovascular fitness, and a decrease of muscle tension. Education as a part of RTW interventions is believed to increase the understanding of patients regarding their disorder and treatment. Behavioural treatments were mainly based on the gate control theory of pain (psychophysiological processes are involved in pain perception) and/or the operant conditioning hypothesis (pain behaviour is determined by its consequences). No concepts were described for ergonomic measures. Finally, the plausibility of the described concepts is discussed. Future RCTs on this topic should evaluate the underlying concepts of the RTW intervention in addition to its effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929354     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200232040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  38 in total

Review 1.  Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  A limited functional restoration program for injured workers: A randomized trial.

Authors:  D T Corey; L E Koepfler; D Etlin; H I Day
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

3.  Functional restoration for chronic low back pain. Two-year follow-up of two randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  A F Bendix; T Bendix; M Labriola; P Boekgaard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  J Guzmán; R Esmail; K Karjalainen; A Malmivaara; E Irvin; C Bombardier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

5.  Functional restoration versus outpatient physical training in chronic low back pain: a randomized comparative study.

Authors:  T Bendix; A Bendix; M Labriola; C Haestrup; N Ebbehøj
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Multimodal cognitive behavioral treatment of patients sicklisted for musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  E M Haldorsen; K Kronholm; J S Skouen; H Ursin
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Conservative treatment in patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain: a prospective randomised study with 12 months' follow-up.

Authors:  T Seferlis; G Németh; A M Carlsson; P Gillström
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach.

Authors:  I Lindström; C Ohlund; C Eek; L Wallin; L E Peterson; W E Fordyce; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-04

9.  A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  P Loisel; P Durand; L Abenhaim; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J M Esdaile
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison.

Authors:  J B Staal; H Hlobil; M W van Tulder; G Waddell; A K Burton; B W Koes; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Modelling return-to-work intervention strategies: a method to help target interventions.

Authors:  Catelijne Joling; Peter P M Janssen; Wim Groot
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-03

3.  Chiropractors' characteristics associated with their number of workers' compensation patients.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; J David Cassidy; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: a descriptive review of content.

Authors:  M J Durand; N Vézina; P Loisel; R Baril; M C Richard; B Diallo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

Review 5.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

Review 6.  How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability?

Authors:  Catherine Briand; Marie-José Durand; Louise St-Arnaud; Marc Corbière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08

Review 7.  Physical exercise interventions to improve disability and return to work in low back pain: current insights and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  J Bart Staal; James Rainville; Julie Fritz; Willem van Mechelen; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 8.  Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eline M Meijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hansson; Tommy Hansson; Robert Jonsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effectiveness of physical training for self-employed persons with musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Heinrich; Johannes R Anema; Ernest M M de Vroome; Birgitte M Blatter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.