Literature DB >> 11918453

Oral etoposide in patients with hematological malignancies: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

E Osby1, E Liliemark, M Björkholm, J Liliemark.   

Abstract

Tumor responses after daily oral administration of low-dose etoposide have been demonstrated in both hematological and solid tumors. The aim of the present phase II trial was to determine tumor response, and toxicity and to delineate the pharmacokinetics of oral low-dose etoposide in patients with hematological malignancies in a palliative treatment setting. Thirty-two patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), acute myeloblastic (AML) and lymphoblastic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were included. Patients were given oral etoposide, 100 mg once daily for 14 d in a 21-d cycle. Serum etoposide concentrations were determined on d 1, 7, and 14 of every cycle before etoposide administration and, in addition, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 h after drug intake on d 1. The median age of patients was 68 yr (range: 50-89 yr). The median time from diagnosis to inclusion in the study was 21 mo (range: 0.5-144 mo) and most patients had advanced disease and were heavily pretreated. Eleven patients completed three or more cycles. Eight of 11 patients with acute leukemia and 1 of 2 with MDS received only 1 course because of toxicity (n = 5) or progression (n = 4). One patient with AML, a Jehovah's Witness, was treated up-front and achieved a complete remission and two patients with low-grade NHL gained a complete and a partial remission, respectively. Twenty-one of 32 patients were evaluable for toxicity during the first cycle. In 67%, the white blood cell count nadir was < 2.0 x 109/L and in 38% < 1.0 x 10(9)/L. Platelet count nadir was less than 25 x 10(9)/L in 24% of evaluable patients. During all cycles (n = 79), eight patients developed febrile neutropenia, four of whom with a fatal outcome. The correlation between the area under the curve (AUC) of the free fraction of etoposide and leukopenia was statistically significant at a log analysis (n = 12; p < 0.05). There was also a statistically significant correlation between the AUC and the 24-h concentration (n = 15; p < 0.005) and between the concentrations at 24 h and d 7 (n = 11; p < 0.005) of the free fractions of etoposide. In conclusion, etoposide had a moderate clinical effect in this group of heavily pretreated patients. Moreover, toxicity was substantial, in particular leukopenia, which correlated to the free-etoposide AUC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11918453     DOI: 10.1385/MO:18:4:269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  32 in total

1.  Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide.

Authors:  D M Ashley; L Meier; T Kerby; F M Zalduondo; H S Friedman; A Gajjar; L Kun; P K Duffner; S Smith; D Longee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial using three dosage schedules.

Authors:  F Cavalli; R W Sonntag; F Jungi; H J Senn; K W Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-03

3.  Remission induction in acute myeloid leukaemia with oral etoposide.

Authors:  J P Evans; H G Prentice
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral etoposide in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma with no prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy.

Authors:  G Schwartsmann; E Sprinz; M Kromfield; L Kalakun; E Sander; G Prolla; L Di Leone; L Gerhardt; D R Mans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prolonged daily administration of oral etoposide in lymphoma following prior therapy with adriamycin, an ifosfamide-containing salvage combination, and intravenous etoposide.

Authors:  N Haim; M Ben-Shahar; R Epelbaum
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  A randomized trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer: the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin; S P Joel; R J Osborne; D I Talbot; P W Johnson; R Reznek; T Masud; W Gregory; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; E A Tolley; H B Niell; J P Griffin; A M Mauer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Predicting etoposide toxicity: relationship to organ function and protein binding.

Authors:  S P Joel; R Shah; P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  High-performance liquid chromatography with fluorometric detection for monitoring of etoposide and its cis-isomer in plasma and leukaemic cells.

Authors:  E Liliemark; B Pettersson; C Peterson; J Liliemark
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl       Date:  1995-07-21
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Induction with azacytidine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a Jehovah's Witness with acute monocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Hege Garelius; Sofia Grund; Dick Stockelberg
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-13

Review 3.  Mitochondrial metabolism as a target for acute myeloid leukemia treatment.

Authors:  Svetlana B Panina; Jingqi Pei; Natalia V Kirienko
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Phase II testing of sunitinib: the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group IND Program Trials IND.182-185.

Authors:  R Buckstein; R M Meyer; L Seymour; J Biagi; H Mackay; S Laurie; E Eisenhauer
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  A pilot study of 3D tissue-engineered bone marrow culture as a tool to predict patient response to therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Kinan Alhallak; Amanda Jeske; Pilar de la Puente; Jennifer Sun; Mark Fiala; Feda Azab; Barbara Muz; Ilyas Sahin; Ravi Vij; John F DiPersio; Abdel Kareem Azab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.