Literature DB >> 8656261

Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide.

D M Ashley1, L Meier, T Kerby, F M Zalduondo, H S Friedman, A Gajjar, L Kun, P K Duffner, S Smith, D Longee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The outcome for patients with recurrent medulloblastoma has historically been poor, with most patients dying of disseminated disease. Here, we report on seven patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, most heavily pretreated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, including parenteral etoposide (VP-16), who showed responses to the administration of repeated courses of low-dose oral VP-16. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients age 4 to 16 years were treated with VP-16 after neuroradiographic and clinical evidence of tumor progression. Six had received prior irradiation. All seven had been pretreated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents and schedules, including parenteral VP-16. VP-16 was administered orally as repeated 21-day courses at 50 mg/m2/d with a 7-day interval between courses. Evaluation consisted of neuroradiographic and clinical examination after completion of every two courses of therapy. Complete blood cell counts were performed weekly.
RESULTS: The major toxicity of oral VP-16 was hematologic, with two patients requiring platelet transfusions due to thrombocytopenia and two requiring RBC transfusions. All seven patients developed treatment-related neutropenia. Two patients were supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) between courses. One patient developed infectious epididymitis after course 2 and required intravenous antibiotics; this illness was complicated by Clostridium difficile colitis. There was one episode of fever associated with neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of seven patients assessed, six have demonstrated partial responses (PRs) and the remaining patient had stable disease (SD).
CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the activity of oral VP-16 in the treatment of a small cohort of pretreated patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. This form of administration of oral VP-16 was well tolerated and produced modest toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8656261     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study.

Authors:  L S Ashby; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Central nervous system cancers.

Authors:  Louis Burt Nabors; Mario Ammirati; Philip J Bierman; Henry Brem; Nicholas Butowski; Marc C Chamberlain; Lisa M DeAngelis; Robert A Fenstermaker; Allan Friedman; Mark R Gilbert; Deneen Hesser; Matthias Holdhoff; Larry Junck; Ronald Lawson; Jay S Loeffler; Moshe H Maor; Paul L Moots; Tara Morrison; Maciej M Mrugala; Herbert B Newton; Jana Portnow; Jeffrey J Raizer; Lawrence Recht; Dennis C Shrieve; Allen K Sills; David Tran; Nam Tran; Frank D Vrionis; Patrick Y Wen; Nicole McMillian; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Tumoricidal effects of etoposide incorporated into solid lipid nanoparticles after intraperitoneal administration in Dalton's lymphoma bearing mice.

Authors:  Lakkireddy Harivardhan Reddy; Jawahar Singh Adhikari; Bilikere Srinirasa Rao Dwarakanath; Rakesh Kumar Sharma; Rayasa Ramachandra Murthy
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Which therapy works better in choroid plexus carcinomas?

Authors:  Su G Berrak; Diane D Liu; Brigitte Wrede; Johannes E Wolff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy or standard salvage therapy in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Sridharan Gururangan; Jeanne Krauser; Melody A Watral; Tim Driscoll; Nicole Larrier; David A Reardon; Jeremy N Rich; Jennifer A Quinn; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Roger E McLendon; Herbert Fuchs; Joanne Kurtzberg; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Childhood medulloblastoma: current status of biology and treatment.

Authors:  Laura J Klesse; Daniel C Bowers
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy?

Authors:  Nicolas André; Manon Carré; Eddy Pasquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in adults with malignant primary brain tumors.

Authors:  L E Abrey; M K Rosenblum; E Papadopoulos; B H Childs; J L Finlay
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Old drugs still work! Oral etoposide in a relapsed medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Marta Perez-Somarriba; Maitane Andión; Miguel A López-Pino; Cinzia Lavarino; Luis Madero; Alvaro Lassaletta
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Feasibility of long-term intraventricular therapy with mafosfamide (n = 26) and etoposide (n = 11): experience in 26 children with disseminated malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Irene Slavc; Elisabeth Schuller; Jutta Falger; Mehmet Günes; Konrad Pillwein; Thomas Czech; Wolfgang Dietrich; Karl Rössler; Karin Dieckmann; Daniela Prayer; Johannes Hainfellner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.