Literature DB >> 8558207

Predicting etoposide toxicity: relationship to organ function and protein binding.

S P Joel1, R Shah, P I Clark, M L Slevin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of organ function on total and free etoposide pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who received single-agent intravenous (i.v.) etoposide over 5 or 8 days (total dose, 500 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived after analysis of total plasma etoposide by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection, and etoposide protein binding by ultrafiltration of an etoposide-spiked, pretreatment serum sample, followed by HPLC analysis. Free etoposide area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was derived from the total AUC and protein binding.
RESULTS: Patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine level > 130 mumol/L) had a lower plasma etoposide clearance (13.6 v 18.5 mL/min/m2; P = .016), resulting in an increased total-drug and free-drug AUC (total etoposide AUC 615 v 452 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .016; free etoposide AUC 26.0 v 17.6 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .026) and increased hematologic toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.3 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .005). Patients with albumin levels less than 35 g/L had no change in total etoposide kinetics but had an increase in unbound etoposide (5.2% v 4.1%; P = .01), resulting in an increase in free etoposide AUC (27.5 v 16.5 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .003) and more profound toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.6 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .004). In patients with normal albumin and creatinine, increased toxicity in those older than 65 years was associated with a reduced drug clearance, and in those with increased liver enzymes by a trend toward an increase in free etoposide AUC.
CONCLUSION: Increased hematologic toxicity after etoposide in patients with abnormal organ function is mediated by an increase in free etoposide AUC. A reduction in dose is clearly indicated in such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8558207     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

Review 1.  Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  Lydia Tchambaz; Chantal Schlatter; Max Jakob; Anita Krähenbühl; Peter Wolf; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Anthracyline-reduced sequential combination chemotherapy for younger patients with good-prognosis aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  P Schütt; K Zimmermann; C Derks; P Ebeling; A Welt; M Poser; J Hense; K Metz; J Anhuf; M Sandmann; M Neise; T Moritz; M Stuschke; N Niederle; S Seeber; Mohammad R Nowrousian
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Use of antineoplastic agents in patients with cancer who have HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Michelle A Rudek; Charles Flexner; Richard F Ambinder
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Oral etoposide in patients with hematological malignancies: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  E Osby; E Liliemark; M Björkholm; J Liliemark
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Effect of renal function on neutrophil decreases following eribulin administration.

Authors:  Norifumi Suzuki; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hirotoshi Murakami; Nobumoto Tomioka; Kenichi Watanabe; Masayuki Endo; Masato Takahashi
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-06-17

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Toxicity patterns of cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  Etienne Chatelut; Jean-Pierre Delord; Pierre Canal
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.