PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of organ function on total and free etoposide pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who received single-agent intravenous (i.v.) etoposide over 5 or 8 days (total dose, 500 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived after analysis of total plasma etoposide by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection, and etoposide protein binding by ultrafiltration of an etoposide-spiked, pretreatment serum sample, followed by HPLC analysis. Free etoposide area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was derived from the total AUC and protein binding. RESULTS: Patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine level > 130 mumol/L) had a lower plasma etoposide clearance (13.6 v 18.5 mL/min/m2; P = .016), resulting in an increased total-drug and free-drug AUC (total etoposide AUC 615 v 452 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .016; free etoposide AUC 26.0 v 17.6 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .026) and increased hematologic toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.3 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .005). Patients with albumin levels less than 35 g/L had no change in total etoposide kinetics but had an increase in unbound etoposide (5.2% v 4.1%; P = .01), resulting in an increase in free etoposide AUC (27.5 v 16.5 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .003) and more profound toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.6 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .004). In patients with normal albumin and creatinine, increased toxicity in those older than 65 years was associated with a reduced drug clearance, and in those with increased liver enzymes by a trend toward an increase in free etoposide AUC. CONCLUSION: Increased hematologic toxicity after etoposide in patients with abnormal organ function is mediated by an increase in free etoposide AUC. A reduction in dose is clearly indicated in such patients.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of organ function on total and free etoposide pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who received single-agent intravenous (i.v.) etoposide over 5 or 8 days (total dose, 500 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived after analysis of total plasma etoposide by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection, and etoposide protein binding by ultrafiltration of an etoposide-spiked, pretreatment serum sample, followed by HPLC analysis. Free etoposide area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was derived from the total AUC and protein binding. RESULTS:Patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine level > 130 mumol/L) had a lower plasma etoposide clearance (13.6 v 18.5 mL/min/m2; P = .016), resulting in an increased total-drug and free-drug AUC (total etoposide AUC 615 v 452 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .016; free etoposide AUC 26.0 v 17.6 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .026) and increased hematologic toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.3 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .005). Patients with albumin levels less than 35 g/L had no change in total etoposide kinetics but had an increase in unbound etoposide (5.2% v 4.1%; P = .01), resulting in an increase in free etoposide AUC (27.5 v 16.5 micrograms/mL.hr; P = .003) and more profound toxicity (nadir neutrophil count 0.6 v 1.9 x 10(9)/L; P = .004). In patients with normal albumin and creatinine, increased toxicity in those older than 65 years was associated with a reduced drug clearance, and in those with increased liver enzymes by a trend toward an increase in free etoposide AUC. CONCLUSION: Increased hematologic toxicity after etoposide in patients with abnormal organ function is mediated by an increase in free etoposide AUC. A reduction in dose is clearly indicated in such patients.
Authors: Lydia Tchambaz; Chantal Schlatter; Max Jakob; Anita Krähenbühl; Peter Wolf; Stephan Krähenbühl Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: P Schütt; K Zimmermann; C Derks; P Ebeling; A Welt; M Poser; J Hense; K Metz; J Anhuf; M Sandmann; M Neise; T Moritz; M Stuschke; N Niederle; S Seeber; Mohammad R Nowrousian Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 4.553