Literature DB >> 3169581

Stereotest artifacts and the strabismus patient.

S M Archer1.   

Abstract

A new use of nonstereoscopic cues in stereopsis testing is described. It consists of alternation of fixation while observing for image jump in the disparate portions of the test target. This may enable some stereoblind strabismus patients to achieve artifactually good stereotest scores and explain those patients who appear to have gross stereopsis on the Titmus test, but are unable to perform any random-dot test of stereopsis. A new stereotest is described which does not resort to a random-dot format and yet is free from lateral displacement and alternation cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3169581     DOI: 10.1007/bf02172957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the TNO -random-dot stereogram test.

Authors:  F C Okuda; L Apt; B S Wanter
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1977

2.  Clinical stereopsis testing: contour and random dot stereograms.

Authors:  J Cooper
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1979-01

3.  Lateral displacement as a response cue in the Titmus Stereo test.

Authors:  J Cooper; J Warshowsky
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-08

4.  What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?

Authors:  G Westheimer; S P McKee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Th monofixation syndrome.

Authors:  M M Parks
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1969

Review 6.  Early surgical alignment for congenital esotropia.

Authors:  M R Ing
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1981

7.  Depth perception in strabismus.

Authors:  D B Henson; D E Williams
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Evaluation of clinical stereoacuity tests.

Authors:  W R Marsh; S C Rawlings; J V Mumma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Discriminant analysis of congenital esotropia surgery. Predictor variables for short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  J B Bateman; M M Parks; N Wheeler
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Surgical treatment of congenital esotropia.

Authors:  E M Helveston; F D Ellis; J Schott; J Mitchelson; J C Weber; S Taube; K Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stereopsis results at 4.5 years of age in the infant aphakia treatment study.

Authors:  E Eugenie Hartmann; Ann U Stout; Michael J Lynn; Kimberly G Yen; Stacey J Kruger; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Modified Test Protocol Improves Sensitivity of the Stereo Fly Test.

Authors:  Angie De La Cruz; Sarah E Morale; Reed M Jost; Krista R Kelly; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2016-01

3.  Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Samantha Wenyan Chan; Bahia Guellai; Daphné Bavelier; Dennis Michael Levi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.