Literature DB >> 11912111

Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke.

James R Carey1, Teresa J Kimberley, Scott M Lewis, Edward J Auerbach, Lisa Dorsey, Peter Rundquist, Kamil Ugurbil.   

Abstract

Hand movement recovery and cortical reorganization were studied in 10 subjects with chronic stroke using functional MRI (fMRI) before and after training with an intensive finger movement tracking programme. Subjects were assigned randomly to a treatment or control group. The treatment group received 18-20 sessions of finger tracking training using target waveforms under variable conditions. The control group crossed over to receive the same treatment after the control period. For comparison with a healthy population, nine well elderly females were also studied; however, the well elderly controls did not cross over after the control period. The dependent variables consisted of a Box and Block score to measure prehensile ability (subjects with stroke only), a tracking accuracy score and quantification of active cortical areas using fMRI. For the tracking tests, the subjects tracked a sine wave target on a computer screen with extension and flexion movements of the paretic index finger. Functional brain images were collected from the frontal and parietal lobes of the subject with a 4 tesla magnet. Areas of interest included the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), primary motor area (M1), primary sensory area (S1), premotor cortex (PMC) and supplementary motor area (SMA). Comparison between all subjects with stroke and all well elderly subjects at pre-test was analysed with two-sample t-tests. Change from pre-test to post-test within subjects was analysed with paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Stroke treatment subjects demonstrated significant improvement in tracking accuracy, whereas stroke control subjects did not until after crossover treatment. At pre-test, the cortical activation in the subjects with stroke was predominantly ipsilateral to the performing hand, whereas in the well elderly subjects it was contralateral. Activation for the stroke treatment group following training switched to contralateral in SMC, M1, S1 and PMC. The stroke control group's activation remained ipsilateral after the control period, but switched to contralateral after crossover to receive treatment. All well elderly subjects maintained predominantly contralateral activation throughout. Transfer of skill to functional activity was shown in significantly improved Box and Block scores for the stroke treatment group, with no such improvement in the stroke control group until after crossover. We concluded that individuals with chronic stroke receiving intensive tracking training showed improved tracking accuracy and grasp and release function, and that these improvements were accompanied by brain reorganization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912111     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  156 in total

1.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.

Authors:  Heidi Johansen-Berg; Matthew F S Rushworth; Marko D Bogdanovic; Udo Kischka; Sunil Wimalaratna; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  fMRI analysis of ankle movement tracking training in subject with stroke.

Authors:  James R Carey; Kathleen M Anderson; Teresa J Kimberley; Scott M Lewis; Edward J Auerbach; Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke.

Authors:  Teresa J Kimberley; Scott M Lewis; Edward J Auerbach; Lisa L Dorsey; Jeanne M Lojovich; James R Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Chronic in vivo imaging shows no evidence of dendritic plasticity or functional remapping in the contralesional cortex after stroke.

Authors:  David G Johnston; Marie Denizet; Ricardo Mostany; Carlos Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Ilan Mizrahi; Kayleen Weaver; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Implicit sequence-specific motor learning after subcortical stroke is associated with increased prefrontal brain activations: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Sean K Meehan; Bubblepreet Randhawa; Brenda Wessel; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Baron; Leonardo G Cohen; Steven C Cramer; Bruce H Dobkin; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Isabelle Loubinoux; Randolph S Marshall; N S Ward
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients.

Authors:  Dinesh G Nair; Siobhan Hutchinson; Felipe Fregni; Michael Alexander; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.