Literature DB >> 11903758

Patient-centered processes of care and long-term outcomes of myocardial infarction.

A M Fremont1, P D Cleary, J L Hargraves, R M Rowe, N B Jacobson, J Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients' experiences with nontechnical aspects of care such as patient education and discharge planning are associated with long-term outcomes.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Twenty-three New Hampshire hospitals during 1996 and 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients (N=2,272) enrolled prior to discharge. MEASUREMENTS: Surveys asking about problems with care and health were mailed to patients 1, 3, and 12 months after discharge. Patients were stratified into "worse" or "better" care groups on the basis of their hospital care problem score. Outcomes included self-reported overall health, physical health, mental health, chest pain, and shortness of breath. Other clinical measures were obtained from hospital discharge abstracts. MAIN
RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 12-month surveys were returned by 1,346 (59.2%), 1,046 (46%), and 964 (42.4%) enrolled patients, respectively. The primary analytic cohort consisted of the 762 patients who completed both the 1- and 12-month surveys. After adjustment for postdischarge health status and other clinical factors, patients experiencing worse hospital care had lower ratings of overall health (48.4 vs 52.5 on 100-point scale; P=.02) and physical health (59.7 vs 68.4; P <.001), and were more likely to have chest pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.4; P=.04) 12 months after their AMI than other patients. However, differences in reports of chest pain were reduced if patients reporting worse hospital care had better experiences with subsequent ambulatory care.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' experiences with nontechnical processes of AMI hospital care are associated with long-term outcomes; however the association between a negative hospital experience and subsequent chest pain may be offset by more positive outpatient experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11903758      PMCID: PMC1495308     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  53 in total

1.  The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; W McMullen; T L Delbanco
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-02

2.  Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  T A Marciniak; E F Ellerbeck; M J Radford; T F Kresowik; J A Gold; H M Krumholz; C I Kiefe; R M Allman; R A Vogel; S F Jencks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  R J Lasek; W Barkley; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Differences in patient-reported processes and outcomes between men and women with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K E Covinsky; M M Chren; D L Harper; L E Way; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes.

Authors:  D S Brody; S M Miller; C E Lerman; D G Smith; G C Caputo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction among patients of cardiologists and generalist physicians.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; E Guadagnoli; B J McNeil; P D Cleary
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997 Dec 8-22

7.  Nondetection of depression by primary care physicians reconsidered.

Authors:  J C Coyne; T L Schwenk; S Fechner-Bates
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Treatment adherence and risk of death after a myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R I Horwitz; C M Viscoli; L Berkman; R M Donaldson; S M Horwitz; C J Murray; D F Ransohoff; J Sindelar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly.

Authors:  L F Berkman; L Leo-Summers; R I Horwitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Medical and economic costs of psychologic distress in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T G Allison; D E Williams; T D Miller; C A Patten; K R Bailey; R W Squires; G T Gau
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  32 in total

1.  Processes and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C I Kiefe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The best of JGIM.

Authors:  Eric B Bass
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  "We'll Get to You When We Get to You": Exploring Potential Contributions of Health Care Staff Behaviors to Patient Perceptions of Discrimination and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Gabriel S Tajeu; Andrea L Cherrington; Lynn Andreae; Candice Prince; Cheryl L Holt; Jewell H Halanych
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Is patient involvement during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction associated with post-discharge treatment outcome? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Judith E Arnetz; Ulrika Winblad; Anna T Höglund; Bertil Lindahl; Kalle Spångberg; Lars Wallentin; Yun Wang; Joel Ager; Bengt B Arnetz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The association of mental health program characteristics and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Austin B Frakt; Jodie Trafton; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Improving organizational climate for quality and quality of care: does membership in a collaborative help?

Authors:  Ingrid M Nembhard; Veronika Northrup; Dale Shaller; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Patient-reported quality of care and pain severity in cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Claire F Snyder; Jennifer L Malin; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-06-26

9.  Case-mix adjustment of consumer reports about managed behavioral health care and health plans.

Authors:  Laura L Eselius; Paul D Cleary; Alan M Zaslavsky; Haiden A Huskamp; Susan H Busch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Methodological challenges associated with patient responses to follow-up longitudinal surveys regarding quality of care.

Authors:  Katherine L Kahn; Honghu Liu; John L Adams; Wen-Pin Chen; Diana M Tisnado; David M Carlisle; Ron D Hays; Carol M Mangione; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.