Literature DB >> 9582042

Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

T A Marciniak1, E F Ellerbeck, M J Radford, T F Kresowik, J A Gold, H M Krumholz, C I Kiefe, R M Allman, R A Vogel, S F Jencks.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Medicare has a legislative mandate for quality assurance, but the effectiveness of its population-based quality improvement programs has been difficult to establish.
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.
DESIGN: Quality improvement project with baseline measurement, feedback, remeasurement, and comparison samples.
SETTING: All acute care hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Preintervention and postintervention samples included all Medicare patients in Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, and Wisconsin discharged with principal diagnoses of acute myocardial infarctions during 2 periods, June 1992 through December 1992 and August 1995 through November 1995. Indicator comparisons were made with a random sample of Medicare patients in the rest of the nation discharged with acute myocardial infarctions from August 1995 through November 1995. Mortality comparisons involved all Medicare patients nationwide with inpatient claims for acute myocardial infarctions during 2 periods, June 1992 through May 1993 and August 1995 through July 1996. INTERVENTION: Data feedback by peer review organizations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality indicators derived from clinical practice guidelines, length of stay, and mortality.
RESULTS: Performance on all quality indicators improved significantly in the 4 pilot states. Administration of aspirin during hospitalization in patients without contraindications improved from 84% to 90% (P< .001), and prescription of beta-blockers at discharge improved from 47% to 68% (P < .001). Mortality at 30 days decreased from 18.9% to 17.1% (P = .005) and at 1 year from 32.3% to 29.6% (P < .001). These improvements in quality occurred during a period when median length of stay decreased from 8 days to 6 days. Performance on all quality indicators except reperfusion was better in the pilot states than in the rest of the nation in 1995, and the differences were statistically significant for aspirin use at discharge (P < .001), beta-blocker use (P < .001), and smoking cessation counseling (P = .02). Postinfarction mortality was not significantly different between the pilot states and the rest of the nation during the baseline period, although it was slightly but significantly better in the pilot states during the follow-up period (absolute mortality difference at 1 year, 0.9%; P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction has improved in the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot states. Performance on the defined quality indicators appeared to be better in the pilot states than in the rest of the nation in 1995 and was associated with reduced mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9582042     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.17.1351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  81 in total

1.  Defining appropriateness: the challenge of knowing the difference.

Authors:  V A Kazandjian
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  Who is missing from the measures? Trends in the proportion and treatment of patients potentially excluded from publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Susannah M Bernheim; Yongfei Wang; Elizabeth H Bradley; Frederick A Masoudi; Saif S Rathore; Joseph S Ross; Elizabeth Drye; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Physician board certification and the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Saif S Rathore; Yongfei Wang; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals.

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

Review 5.  In-hospital initiation of statin therapy in patients with acute coronary events.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  The evolving science of quality measurement for hospitals: implications for studies of competition and consolidation.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Ryan Mutter
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

7.  Changes in rates of beta-blocker use in community hospital patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adesuwa B Olomu; Ralph E Watson; Azfar-e-Alam Siddiqi; Francesca C Dwamena; Barbara A McIntosh; Peter Vasilenko; Joel Kupersmith; Margaret M Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Benchmarking of trauma care worldwide: the potential value of an International Trauma Data Bank (ITDB).

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Zain G Hashmi; Sonia Gupta; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Jean-Stephane David; David T Efron; Kent A Stevens; Hasnain Zafar; Eric B Schneider; Eric Voiglio; Raul Coimbra; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Life Years Gained From Smoking-Cessation Counseling After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Emily M Bucholz; Adam L Beckman; Catarina I Kiefe; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Effects of an enhanced secondary prevention program for patients with heart disease: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven M Edworthy; Bonnie Baptie; Donna Galvin; Rollin F Brant; Terry Churchill-Smith; Dante Manyari; Israel Belenkie
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.