Literature DB >> 10718897

Differences in patient-reported processes and outcomes between men and women with myocardial infarction.

K E Covinsky1, M M Chren, D L Harper, L E Way, G E Rosenthal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research measuring differences in the care between men and women with myocardial infarction has focused on differences in procedure use and mortality. However, little is known about differences in processes and outcomes that are reported by patients, such as interpersonal processes of care and health status. Our goal was to measure differences in patient-reported measures for men and women who recently were hospitalized with myocardial infarction. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: We surveyed by mail patients with myocardial infarction discharged to home from one of 27 Cleveland area hospitals 3 months following discharge; 502 (64%) of 783 patients responded. The mean age of subjects was 65 years and 40% were women. MEASUREMENTS: Process measures included the quality of communication during the hospitalization and at time of discharge and reports of health education discussions during hospitalization. Outcome measures included physical and mental health component scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, change in work status, and days spent in bed because of ill health. We compared processes and outcomes in men and women using multivariate analyses that adjusted for age, other demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, severity of the myocardial infarction, and premorbid global health status. MAIN
RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, women were as likely as men to report at least one problem with communication during the hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.56 to 1. 33) or at time of discharge (OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.89) and to report that they were given dietary advice before discharge (OR 0. 60; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.01), were told what to do if they developed chest pain (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.23), or, if they smoked cigarettes, given advice about how to stop smoking (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.58). However, 3 months after discharge, women reported worse physical health (P <.05) and mental health (P <.05), were more likely to report spending time in bed because of ill health (OR 1. 80; 95% CI, 1.06, 3.05), and were more likely to report working less than before their myocardial infarction (OR 4.02; 95% CI, 1.58 to 10. 20).
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of processes of care measured with patient reports, women with myocardial infarction reported their quality of care to be similar to that of men. However, 3 months following myocardial infarction, women reported worse health status and were less likely to return to work than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718897      PMCID: PMC1495353          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.01269.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  28 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis and management after a first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A J Moss; J Benhorin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; M Roberts; T W Moloney; W McMullen; J D Walker; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry.

Authors:  C Maynard; P E Litwin; J S Martin; W D Weaver
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

4.  Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias?

Authors:  H M Krumholz; P S Douglas; M S Lauer; R C Pasternak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Differences between women and men in survival after myocardial infarction. Biology or methodology?

Authors:  N H Fiebach; C M Viscoli; R I Horwitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  After correcting for worse baseline characteristics, women treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction have the same mortality and morbidity as men except for a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke. The Investigators of the International Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase Mortality Study.

Authors:  H D White; G I Barbash; M Modan; J Simes; R Diaz; J R Hampton; J Heikkilä; A Kristinsson; S Moulopoulos; E A Paolasso
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. MIDAS Study Group. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System.

Authors:  J B Kostis; A C Wilson; K O'Dowd; P Gregory; S Chelton; N M Cosgrove; A Chirala; T Cui
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The impact of a physician's warning on recovery after alcoholism treatment.

Authors:  D C Walsh; R W Hingson; D M Merrigan; S M Levenson; G A Coffman; T Heeren; L A Cupples
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Change in quality of life in the year following cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; M Kulig; S Binting; H Völler; H Gohlke; K Linde; S N Willich
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Is patient involvement during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction associated with post-discharge treatment outcome? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Judith E Arnetz; Ulrika Winblad; Anna T Höglund; Bertil Lindahl; Kalle Spångberg; Lars Wallentin; Yun Wang; Joel Ager; Bengt B Arnetz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the influences of patient-centered care and evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Mark Meterko; Steven Wright; Hai Lin; Elliott Lowy; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; S Roll; S N Willich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Patient-centered processes of care and long-term outcomes of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A M Fremont; P D Cleary; J L Hargraves; R M Rowe; N B Jacobson; J Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.