Literature DB >> 7737492

Nondetection of depression by primary care physicians reconsidered.

J C Coyne1, T L Schwenk, S Fechner-Bates.   

Abstract

This article examines the rates of detection for major depression and other depressive disorders by family physicians as well as the differences between detected and undetected cases in terms of a variety of demographic and clinical variables. A total of 1,580 family practice patients completed a screening form and were rated by their physician. Patients with elevated Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) scores were oversampled for possible interviews using the Structure Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). In the resulting weighted sample, family physicians detected 34.9% of cases of major depression and 27.9% of cases of any depressive disorder. Detection was associated with pharmacological and psychological intervention. However, the undetected cases tended to be mildly depressed and higher functioning. Presence of a current anxiety disorder facilitated detection. Overall, the mildness of undetected depression and associated impairment have implications for estimates of the consequences of primary care physicians' low rates of nondetection and for the development of interventional strategies to improve their performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7737492     DOI: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)00056-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  59 in total

1.  Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many.

Authors:  M A Whooley; A L Avins; J Miranda; W S Browner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Sleep disturbance, inflammation and depression risk in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Michael R Irwin; Richard E Olmstead; Patricia A Ganz; Reina Haque
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; James C Coyne
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Long-term effectiveness of collaborative depression care in older primary care patients with and without PTSD symptoms.

Authors:  Domin Chan; Ming-Yu Fan; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Comorbid chronic illness and the diagnosis and treatment of depression in safety net primary care settings.

Authors:  Chizobam Ani; Mohsen Bazargan; David Hindman; Douglas Bell; Michael Rodriguez; Richard S Baker
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Screening for depression in primary care. A disease in search of a test.

Authors:  T L Schwenk
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Detecting psychiatric illness.

Authors:  M Moore
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Collaboration and Referral Between Internal Medicine and Psychiatry.

Authors:  Hermioni N Lokko; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-02-26

9.  Effectiveness of collaborative care depression treatment in Veterans' Affairs primary care.

Authors:  Susan C Hedrick; Edmund F Chaney; Bradford Felker; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nicole Hasenberg; Patrick Heagerty; Jan Buchanan; Rocco Bagala; Diane Greenberg; Grady Paden; Stephan D Fihn; Wayne Katon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Impact of demographic factors on recognition of persons with depression and anxiety in primary care in Slovenia.

Authors:  Janez Rifel; Igor Svab; Marija Petek Ster; Danica Rotar Pavlic; Michael King; Irwin Nazareth
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.