Literature DB >> 11901808

NAATs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: a promise still unfulfilled.

J Schachter1.   

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have created a revolution in our ability to diagnose chlamydial infections. They are markedly more sensitive (while maintaining exquisite specificity) than previously used tests. They can be used with noninvasively collected specimens (first-catch urine for men or women and vaginal swabs from women). This allows their use in screening asymptomatic individuals who represent the bulk of prevalent infections. Mishandling of urine specimens can lead to false-negative results and few are aware of that potential for getting incorrect results. The leading deterrent to the acceptance of NAATs has been their perceived cost. This is based on the purchase price of tests and fails to consider the total cost of testing, which also includes costs of specimen collection, where NAATs have a major advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11901808     DOI: 10.1586/14737159.1.2.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  8 in total

1.  Confirming positive results of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: all NAATs are not created equal.

Authors:  J Schachter; E W Hook; D H Martin; D Willis; P Fine; D Fuller; J Jordan; W M Janda; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Shirley L Shih; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.

Authors:  Julius Schachter; Joan M Chow; Holly Howard; Gail Bolan; Jeanne Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  External quality assessment for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  V J Chalker; H Vaughan; P Patel; A Rossouw; H Seyedzadeh; K Gerrard; V L A James
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  B Boyadzhyan; T Yashina; J H Yatabe; M Patnaik; C S Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Future of human Chlamydia vaccine: potential of self-adjuvanting biodegradable nanoparticles as safe vaccine delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Rajnish Sahu; Richa Verma; Saurabh Dixit; Joseph U Igietseme; Carolyn M Black; Skyla Duncan; Shree R Singh; Vida A Dennis
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 7.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update.

Authors:  Meenakshi Malhotra; Seema Sood; Anjan Mukherjee; Sumathi Muralidhar; Manju Bala
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Poor Performance of the Chlamydia Rapid Test Device for the Detection of Asymptomatic Infections in South African Men: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  N S Abbai-Shaik; T Reddy; S Govender; G Ramjee
Journal:  J Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-04-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.