Literature DB >> 21342066

Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Anna S Graseck1, Shirley L Shih, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major public health concern that must be addressed with innovative screening methods to supplement traditional approaches. Home-based screening with self-collected urine or vaginal specimens is a highly feasible and acceptable method, and shows promise in improving STI screening rates in both men and women. Home collection kits have been offered in a variety of settings, with results ranging from very modest improvements in screening rates to 100-fold increases beyond the rates observed with clinic-based screening. This article describes and evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of various home screening strategies used for the detection of STIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342066      PMCID: PMC3097250          DOI: 10.1586/eri.10.164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther        ISSN: 1478-7210            Impact factor:   5.091


  68 in total

1.  Home compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians.

Authors:  Janet S St Lawrence; Daniel E Montaño; Danuta Kasprzyk; William R Phillips; Keira Armstrong; Jami S Leichliter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Lessons learned from a population-based chlamydia screening pilot.

Authors:  Hannelore M Götz; Jan E A M van Bergen; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Jan Broer; A J J Coenen; F de Groot; M J C Verhooren; D T van Schaik; Jan H Richardus
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.359

4.  Community-based chlamydia and gonorrhea screening through the United States mail, San Francisco.

Authors:  Peter J Bloomfield; Charlotte Kent; Diane Campbell; Larry Hanbrook; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Robert L Cook; Shari L Hutchison; Lars Østergaard; R Scott Braithwaite; Roberta B Ness
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Does the addition of a urine testing kit to use of contact slips increase the partner notification rates for genital chlamydial infection?

Authors:  A Apoola; J Beardsley
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.

Authors:  N Low; A McCarthy; J Macleod; C Salisbury; P J Horner; T E Roberts; R Campbell; A Herring; S Skidmore; E Sanford; J A C Sterne; G Davey Smith; A Graham; M Huengsberg; J Ross; M Egger
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.

Authors:  Lynne Martin; Eleanor Freedman; Leanne Burton; Scott Rutter; Vickie Knight; Alfa D'Amato; Carolyn Murray; Jackie Drysdale; Sophie Harvey; Anna McNulty
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.706

9.  A novel gel-based method for self-collection and ambient temperature postal transport of urine for PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Bialasiewicz; D M Whiley; M Buhrer-Skinner; C Bautista; K Barker; S Aitken; R Gordon; R Muller; S B Lambert; J Debattista; M D Nissen; T P Sloots
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study.

Authors:  Loretta Brabin; Grace Thomas; Mark Hopkins; Karen O'Brien; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  17 in total

1.  Home Self-Collection by Mail to Test for Human Papillomavirus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Andrea C Des Marais; Yuqian Zhao; Marcia M Hobbs; Vijay Sivaraman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Sexually transmitted infection testing practices among 'money boys' and general men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China: objective versus self-reported status.

Authors:  Lavinia Lin; Eric J Nehl; Alvin Tran; Na He; Tony Zheng; Frank Y Wong
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  Acceptability and feasibility of recruiting women to collect a self-administered vaginal swab at a pharmacy clinic for sexually transmissible infection screening.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; M Barnes; J Holden; B Silver; R Smith; J Hardick; T C Quinn
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Let's Take A "Selfie": Self-Collected Samples for Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Advances and challenges in biosensor-based diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Mandy L Y Sin; Kathleen E Mach; Pak Kin Wong; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 6.  Control of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the era of evolving antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lindley A Barbee; Julia C Dombrowski
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.982

7.  Rationale and design of REACT: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of home-collection to increase chlamydia retesting and detect repeat positive tests.

Authors:  Kirsty S Smith; Jane S Hocking; Marcus Chen; Christopher K Fairley; Anna McNulty; Phillip Read; Catriona S Bradshaw; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Handan Wand; Marion Saville; William Rawlinson; Suzanne M Garland; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca Guy
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

Authors:  Luisa Fajardo-Bernal; Johanna Aponte-Gonzalez; Patrick Vigil; Edith Angel-Müller; Carlos Rincon; Hernando G Gaitán; Nicola Low
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-29

Review 9.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad S Jamil; Jane S Hocking; Heidi M Bauer; Hammad Ali; Handan Wand; Kirsty Smith; Jennifer Walker; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hilde Kløvstad; Olav Natås; Aage Tverdal; Preben Aavitsland
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.