Literature DB >> 16825373

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.

Julius Schachter1, Joan M Chow, Holly Howard, Gail Bolan, Jeanne Moncada.   

Abstract

We evaluated three CDC-suggested approaches for confirming positive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: (i) repeat the original test on the original specimen, (ii) retest the original specimen with a different test, and (iii) perform a different test on a duplicate specimen. For approach 1, specimens (genital swabs or first-catch urine [FCU]) initially positive by the Abbott LCx Probe System Chlamydia trachomatis Assay (LCx; Abbott Laboratories), the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay (AC2; Gen-Probe Inc.), the Amplicor CT/NG Assay (PCR; Roche Diagnostics Corp.), or the BD ProbeTec ET System C. trachomatis amplified-DNA assay (SDA; Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems) were retested by the same NAAT. In several evaluations, multiple efforts were made to confirm the original positive result. For approach 2, specimens initially positive by SDA and the Hybrid Capture 2 CT-ID DNA Test (HC2; Digene Corp.) were retested by different NAATs (SDA, PCR, AC2, and the APTIMA assay for C. trachomatis [ACT]). For approach 3, duplicate male urethral or cervical swabs were tested by SDA or by both AC2 and ACT. FCU specimens were tested by all three tests. We found that 84 to 98% of SDA, LCx, PCR, and AC2 positive results were confirmed by a repeat test and that 89 to 99% of SDA and AC2 and 93% of HC2 positive results were confirmed by different NAATs, but that some NAATs cannot be used to confirm other NAATs. The use of repeat testing did not confirm 11% of C. trachomatis SDA positive results that could be confirmed by more extensive testing. Doing more testing confirms more positive results; >90% of all positive NAATs could be confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825373      PMCID: PMC1489520          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02620-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Ability of the digene hybrid capture II test to identify Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical specimens.

Authors:  J Schachter; E W Hook; W M McCormack; T C Quinn; M Chernesky; S Chong; J I Girdner; P B Dixon; L DeMeo; E Williams; A Cullen; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reproducibility problems with the Abbott laboratories LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  A M Gronowski; S Copper; D Baorto; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Confirming positive results of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: all NAATs are not created equal.

Authors:  J Schachter; E W Hook; D H Martin; D Willis; P Fine; D Fuller; J Jordan; W M Janda; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; M Ieven; S Pattyn; L Van Damme; M Laga
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  NAATs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: a promise still unfulfilled.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; D V Ferrero; L Buck-Barrington; E Hook; C Lenderman; T Quinn; C A Gaydos; J Lovchik; J Schachter; J Moncada; G Hall; M J Tuohy; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men.

Authors:  R E Johnson; T A Green; J Schachter; R B Jones; E W Hook; C M Black; D H Martin; M E St Louis; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  D H Martin; C Cammarata; B Van Der Pol; R B Jones; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos; K Crotchfelt; J Schachter; J Moncada; D Jungkind; B Turner; C Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos; K Crotchfelt; J Schachter; J Moncada; D Jungkind; D H Martin; B Turner; C Peyton; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Accuracy of results obtained by performing a second ligase chain reaction assay and PCR analysis on urine samples with positive or near-cutoff results in the LCx test for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Castriciano; K Luinstra; D Jang; J Patel; J Mahony; J Kapala; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  24 in total

1.  Repeating low-positive nucleic acid amplification test results for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: assessment of current practice in selected california public- and private-sector laboratories.

Authors:  Joan M Chow; Heidi M Bauer; Gail Bolan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Routine confirmation of positive nucleic acid amplification test results for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is not necessary.

Authors:  Julius Schachter; Max A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Stability Studies on Dry Swabs and Wet Mailed Swabs for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Aptima Assays.

Authors:  Jeanne Moncada; Carey B Clark; Jeffrey Holden; Edward W Hook; Charlotte A Gaydos; Julius Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 5.  [Modern diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections].

Authors:  T Meyer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Diagnostic characteristics of tests for ocular Chlamydia after mass azithromycin distributions.

Authors:  Jeremy D Keenan; Craig W See; Jeanne Moncada; Berhan Ayele; Teshome Gebre; Nicole E Stoller; Charles E McCulloch; Travis C Porco; Bruce D Gaynor; Paul M Emerson; Julius Schachter; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Female epidemiology of transcription-mediated amplification-based Trichomonas vaginalis detection in a metropolitan setting with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infection.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Timothy Kramme; Maureen Napierala; Kimber L Munson; Cheryl Miller; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Confirming the Chlamydia trachomatis status of referred rectal specimens.

Authors:  Sarah Alexander; Iona Martin; Catherine Ison
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Determining cystic fibrosis-affected lung microbiology: comparison of spontaneous and serially induced sputum samples by use of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling.

Authors:  Geraint B Rogers; Stuart Skelton; David J Serisier; Christopher J van der Gast; Kenneth D Bruce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Screening of male patients for Trichomonas vaginalis with transcription-mediated amplification in a community with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infection.

Authors:  Kimber L Munson; Maureen Napierala; Erik Munson; Ronald F Schell; Timothy Kramme; Cheryl Miller; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.