Literature DB >> 15117384

Evaluating decision aids--where next?

Alicia O'Cathain1, Kate J Thomas.   

Abstract

Decision aids have been developed to help patients become involved in decision-making about their individual health care. During the evaluation of a particular decision aid in maternity care--a set of 10 'Informed Choice' leaflets--we considered the lessons learnt for evaluation of decision aids in the future. Decision aids have been tested mainly in explanatory trials and have been found to be effective. We argue that existing decision aids should be subjected to more pragmatic trials to test their effectiveness in the real world. The small amount of evidence on their use in the real world shows that they face challenges, resulting in poor implementation. Therefore, we propose that implementation strategies are developed which take heed of the findings of research on getting evidence into practice, and in particular address structural barriers such as the lack of time available to health professionals. We recommend that these 'decision aid implementation packages' are developed in conjunction with both health professionals and patients, and identify and address potential barriers to both the delivery of patient involvement in decision-making, and the use of decision aids, in the real world. These 'packages' can then be submitted to pragmatic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117384      PMCID: PMC5060229          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00258.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  22 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review.

Authors:  C Estabrooks; V Goel; E Thiel; P Pinfold; C Sawka; I Williams
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-07

2.  Self help smoking cessation in pregnancy: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laurence Moore; Rona Campbell; Amanda Whelan; Nicola Mills; Phillippa Lupton; Elizabeth Misselbrook; Julie Frohlich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

3.  Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test.

Authors:  W M Simpson; F D Johnstone; F M Boyd; D J Goldberg; G J Hart; R J Prescott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-24

4.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.

Authors:  Helen Stapleton; Mavis Kirkham; Gwenan Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

6.  Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Diane Valade; Catherine Orlowski; Catherine Draus; Barbara Nabozny-Valerio; Susan Keiser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care.

Authors:  Nikki Rousseau; Elaine McColl; John Newton; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

8.  Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; T A Sheldon; A Sowden; I S Watt
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.

Authors:  R Grol; J Dalhuijsen; S Thomas; C Veld; G Rutten; H Mokkink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-26

10.  Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Eccles; Elaine McColl; Nick Steen; Nikki Rousseau; Jeremy Grimshaw; David Parkin; Ian Purves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; Ann Barry Flood; Greta Friedemann-Sánchez; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources.

Authors:  Kerry A Silvia; Elissa M Ozanne; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vanita Bhavnani; Brian Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Evaluation of a decision aid for families considering p53 genetic counseling and testing.

Authors:  Susan K Peterson; Rebecca D Pentz; Amie M Blanco; Patricia A Ward; Beatty G Watts; Salma K Marani; Leslie Colvin James; Louise C Strong
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598].

Authors:  N Nassar; C L Roberts; C H Raynes-Greenow; A Barratt; B Peat
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Clinical effectiveness of a patient decision aid to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PANDAs) in general practice.

Authors:  Nigel Mathers; Chirk Jenn Ng; Michael Joseph Campbell; Brigitte Colwell; Ian Brown; Alastair Bradley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Carol L Bennett; Justin Presseau; Annette M O'Connor; Susan L Mitchell; Jacqueline M Tetroe; Ann Cranney; Paul Hebert; Shawn D Aaron
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  A decision aid for COPD patients considering inhaled steroid therapy: development and before and after pilot testing.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Brydon J B Grant; Gordon H Guyatt; Victor M Montori; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.