Literature DB >> 11281914

Supporting and resourcing treatment decision-making: some policy considerations.

Vikki A. Entwistle1.   

Abstract

This paper considers some of the policy implications of issues raised during a conference about treatment decision-making in the clinical encounter held in Hamilton, Ontario in May 1999. Policies promoting patient participation in treatment decision-making need to be flexible enough to ensure that they are appropriate across the range of contexts in which health care decisions are made and acceptable to people with diverse preferences and abilities. They should also be formulated in consideration of other health policies and of available resources. Policies of informing people and involving them in decisions about their care are unlikely to be simple to implement. Various strategies might be needed to support them. These include the development of appropriate skills among health professionals and in the general population, the use of interventions to encourage people to play more active roles in decisions about their health care, the provision of decision aids for people facing specific decisions and the provision and accreditation of more general information resources and services. If information and other facilitators of patient participation in decision-making are seen as integral to good quality health care, then funding should be made available for them. This will, however, have opportunity costs. Policy makers' decisions about how much health care funding should be invested in which strategies should be underpinned by good research evidence about the effects that different types of intervention have on a range of outcomes for individuals, health care systems and populations. The knowledge on which current policies are based is limited. The development of future policies will be enhanced if policy makers invest in critical conceptual thinking, reflective practice, imaginative development work and good quality evaluative research.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11281914      PMCID: PMC5081083          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  21 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review.

Authors:  H Bekker; J G Thornton; C M Airey; J B Connelly; J Hewison; M B Robinson; J Lilleyman; M MacIntosh; A J Maule; S Michie; A D Pearman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Observations on the NHS internal market: will the dodo get the last laugh?

Authors:  R G Royce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-12

5.  A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; P Tugwell; G A Wells; T Elmslie; E Jolly; G Hollingworth; R McPherson; H Bunn; I Graham; E Drake
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1998-03

6.  Communication patterns of primary care physicians.

Authors:  D L Roter; M Stewart; S M Putnam; M Lipkin; W Stiles; T S Inui
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Practical issues in assisting shared decision-making.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Michael D. Brundage; Beth A. McConnell; William J. MacKillop
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

9.  Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; T A Sheldon; A Sowden; I S Watt
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 10.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

View more
  9 in total

1.  Editorial: special conference issue.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; H Llewellyn-Thomas; V Entwistle; A Coulter; A O'Connor; D R Rovner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

3.  Perceived service quality, perceived value, overall satisfaction and happiness of outlook for long-term care institution residents.

Authors:  Jesun Lin; Chih-Tung Hsiao; Robert Glen; Jar-Yuan Pai; Sin-Huei Zeng
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber; Nancy Kraetschmer; Sara Urowitz; Natasha Sharpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  The role of patients' meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems.

Authors:  Jack Dowie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; S J Walters; J P Nicholl; K J Thomas; M Kirkham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

7.  How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?

Authors:  Nancy Kraetschmer; Natasha Sharpe; Sara Urowitz; Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Informed patients, reformed clinicians.

Authors:  Brian Fisher; Anna Dixon; Alasdair Honeyman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  A qualitative exploration of treatment decision-making role preference in adult asthma patients.

Authors:  Ann-Louise Caress; Karen Luker; Ashley Woodcock; Kinta Beaver
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.