Literature DB >> 17246306

Homozygous and Hemizygous Viability Variation on the X Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

W F Eanes1, J Hey, D Houle.   

Abstract

We report here a study of viability inbreeding depression associated with the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Fifty wild chromosomes from Mt. Sinai, New York, and 90 wild chromosomes from Death Valley, California, were extracted using the marked FM6 balancer chromosome and viabilities measured for homozygous and heterozygous females, and for hemizygous males, relative to FM6 males as a standard genotype. No statistically significant female genetic load was observed for either chromosome set, although a 95% confidence limit estimated the total load <0.046 for the samples pooled. About 10% of the Death Valley chromosomes appear to be "supervital" as homozygotes. There is little evidence for a pervasive sex-limited detrimental load on the X chromosome; the evidence indicates nearly identical viability effects in males and homozygous females excluding the supervital chromosomes. The average degree of dominance for viability polygenes is estimated between 0.23 to 0.36, which is consistent with autosomal variation and implies near additivity. We conclude that there is little genetic load associated with viability variation on the X chromosome and that the substantial reduction in total fitness observed for chromosome homozygosity in an earlier study may be due largely to sex-limited fertility in females.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 17246306      PMCID: PMC1202675     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  X-chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A N Wilton; J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  A model of the negative correlation between male recombination and transmission frequency in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  An Analysis of Male-Recombination Elements in a Natural Population of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER in South Texas.

Authors:  K A Matthews; Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The P family of transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  W R Engels
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population.

Authors:  T Mukai; O Yamaguchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; R A Cardellino; T K Watanabe; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic load in natural populations: is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection?

Authors:  M L Tracey; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic activity along 315 kb of the Drosophila chromosome.

Authors:  B Bossy; L M Hall; P Spierer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  12 in total

1.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; P Whitley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimating within-locus nonadditive coefficient and discriminating dominance versus overdominance as the genetic cause of heterosis.

Authors:  H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Local adaptation and the evolution of inversions on sex chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Colin Olito; Ludovic Dutoit; Homa Papoli; Filip Ruzicka; Lengxob Yong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Gibson; Adam K Chippindale; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo activities associated with the G6PD allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W F Eanes; L Katona; M Longtine
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon; Max Reuter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Jessica M Bouchard; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.