Literature DB >> 17848019

The roles of encoding, retrieval, and awareness in change detection.

Melissa R Beck1, Matrhew S Peterson, Bonnie L Angelone.   

Abstract

In the experiment reported here, we examined the processes by which expected (probable) changes are detected more frequently than are unexpected (improbable) changes (the change probability effect; Beck, Angelone, & Levin, 2004). The change probability effect may be caused by a bias toward probable changes during encoding of the prechange aspect, during retrieval of the prechange aspect, or during activation of an explicit response to the change. Participants performed a change detection task for probable and improbable changes while their eye movements were tracked. Change detection performance was superior for probable changes, but long-term memory performance was equivalent for both probable and improbable changes. Therefore, although both probable and improbable prechange aspects were encoded, probable prechange aspects were more likely to be retrieved during change detection. Implicit change detection was also greater for probable changes than for improbable changes, suggesting that the change probability effect is the result of a bias during the retrieval and comparison stage of change detection. The stimuli used in the change detection task may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848019     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  An implicit measure of undetected change.

Authors:  I M Thornton; D Fernandez-Duque
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

4.  The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures.

Authors:  Bonnie L Angelone; Daniel T Levin; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

6.  Knowledge about the probability of change affects change detection performance.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Bonnie L Angelone; Daniel T Levin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel T Levin; Daniel J Simons; Bonnie L Angelone; Christopher F Chabris
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-08

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Amanda E van Lamsweerde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

2.  The eyes know: eye movements as a veridical index of memory.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Carol L Baym; David E Warren; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-02-10

3.  Worth a glance: using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Robert R Althoff; David E Warren; Lily Riggs; Neal J Cohen; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Yang; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-01-30

5.  The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point?

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Anthony J Greene
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and comparison.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; Sandra N Moses; Lily Riggs; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Eye movements provide an index of veridical memory for temporal order.

Authors:  Thanujeni Pathman; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Supporting dynamic change detection: using the right tool for the task.

Authors:  Benoît R Vallières; Helen M Hodgetts; François Vachon; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-19

9.  A major role for retrieval and/or comparison in the set-size effects of change detection.

Authors:  James C Moreland; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Eye Movements Index Implicit Memory Expression in Fear Conditioning.

Authors:  Lauren S Hopkins; Douglas H Schultz; Deborah E Hannula; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.