Literature DB >> 16326793

Control, compare and communicate: designing control charts to summarise efficiently data from multiple quality indicators.

B Guthrie1, T Love, T Fahey, A Morris, F Sullivan.   

Abstract

Summarising the complex data generated by multiple cross sectional quality indicators in a way that patients, clinicians, managers and policymakers find useful is challenging. A common approach is aggregation to create summary measures such as star ratings and balanced score cards, but these may conceal the detail needed to focus quality improvement. We propose an alternative way of summarising and presenting multiple quality indicators, suitable for use for quality improvement and governance. This paper discusses (1) control charts for repeated measurements of single processes as used in industrial statistical process control (SPC); (2) control charts for cross sectional comparison of many institutions for a single quality indicator (rarely used in industry but commonly proposed for health care); and (3) small multiple graphics which combine control chart signal extraction with efficient graphical presentations for multiple indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326793      PMCID: PMC1744105          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  13 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Performance league tables: the NHS deserves better.

Authors:  Peymané Adab; Andrew M Rouse; Mohammed A Mohammed; Tom Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

Review 3.  What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers.

Authors:  Mary E Vaiana; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems.

Authors:  S A Kirk; S M Campbell; S Kennell-Webb; D Reeves; M O Roland; M N Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

5.  The legacy of Bristol: public disclosure of individual surgeons' results.

Authors:  Bruce Keogh; David Spiegelhalter; Alan Bailey; James Roxburgh; Patrick Magee; Colin Hilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

6.  The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration.

Authors:  A D Morris; D I Boyle; R MacAlpine; A Emslie-Smith; R T Jung; R W Newton; T M MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-30

7.  Interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Dwomoa Adu; Paul Cockwell; Natalie J Ives; Jonathan Shaw; Keith Wheatley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

8.  Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A randomized controlled trial of league tables and control charts as aids to health service decision-making.

Authors:  Tom Marshall; Mohammed A Mohammed; Andrew Rouse
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of a Formal Debriefing Program After Pediatric Rapid Response Team Activations.

Authors:  Linda Aponte-Patel; Arash Salavitabar; Pamela Fazzio; Andrew S Geneslaw; Pamela Good; Anita I Sen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-04

2.  The impact of disease severity adjustment on hospital standardised mortality ratios: Results from a service-wide analysis of ischaemic stroke admissions using linked pre-hospital, admissions and mortality data.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Chris Goumas; Bin Jalaludin; John Worthington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  High-risk prescribing and monitoring in primary care: how common is it, and how can it be improved?

Authors:  Tobias Dreischulte; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.