Literature DB >> 19472047

Attitudes towards gamete donation among IVF doctors in the Nordic countries-are they in line with national legislation?

Claudia Lampic1, Agneta Skoog Svanberg, Gunilla Sydsjö.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare attitudes towards gamete donation between IVF doctors in the Nordic countries, and to determine whether attitudes are in correspondence with national legislation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study-specific questionnaire was used to study attitudes of 108 IVF doctors (92% response). Participants constituted 78% of all IVF doctors in Sweden, Denmark and Norway and 15% of IVF doctors in Finland.
RESULTS: Despite similar legislation regarding offspring right to learn his/her donor's identity, IVF doctors from Norway reported significantly more negative attitudes towards disclosure than did Swedish physicians. A majority from all countries demonstrated positive attitudes towards embryo donation and allowing sperm donation for lesbian couples. Physicians reported strong support for anonymous donation but less support for 'known' donation.
CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies between IVF doctors' attitudes towards gamete donation and national legislation in four Nordic countries. Negative attitudes towards disclosure to offspring may counteract legislative intentions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472047      PMCID: PMC2719069          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9311-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  23 in total

1.  Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion.

Authors:  I de la Fuente Fonnest; F Søndergaard; G Fonnest; A Vedsted-Jacobsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Infertility, technology and the law. Patients' and future doctors' opinions.

Authors:  J Sundby; A Olsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  To tell or not to tell--what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination.

Authors:  F Lindblad; C Gottlieb; O Lalos
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.949

4.  Donor insemination programmes with personal donors: issues of secrecy.

Authors:  V A Adair; A Purdie
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes.

Authors:  C Gottlieb; O Lalos; F Lindblad
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy.

Authors:  A J Turner; A Coyle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Attitudes on access to services at assisted reproductive technology clinics: comparisons with clinic policy.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Catherine P Cramer; Andrew Garrod; Ronald M Green
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Brewaeys; M T Giavazzi; D Guerra; F MacCallum; J Rust
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden.

Authors:  A Skoog Svanberg; C Lampic; T Bergh; O Lundkvist
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure.

Authors:  Emma Lycett; Ken Daniels; Ruth Curson; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS).

Authors:  Vibha Rai; Amanda Betsworth; Charlotte Beer; George Ndukwe; Cris Glazebrook
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Impact of egg donation deliveries from domestic and overseas sources on maternal care: a questionnaire survey of Japanese perinatal physicians.

Authors:  Yuri Hibino; Yosuke Shimazono
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 3.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

4.  Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö; M Bladh; C Lampic
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The relationship of sociocultural beliefs and infertile couples' attitude toward reproductive donation: A descriptive-correlational study.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Hamideh Jafari; Ali Taghipour
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2018-06-13

6.  Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.

Authors:  S Isaksson; G Sydsjö; A Skoog Svanberg; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.

Authors:  C Lampic; A Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.918

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.