Literature DB >> 11865995

Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.

Sophie Paquerault1, Nicholas Petrick, Heang-Ping Chan, Berkman Sahiner, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

Recent clinical studies have proved that computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are helpful for improving lesion detection by radiologists in mammography. However, these systems would be more useful if the false-positive rate is reduced. Current CAD systems generally detect and characterize suspicious abnormal structures in individual mammographic images. Clinical experiences by radiologists indicate that screening with two mammographic views improves the detection accuracy of abnormalities in the breast. It is expected that the fusion of information from different mammographic views will improve the performance of CAD systems. We are developing a two-view matching method that utilizes the geometric locations, and morphological and textural features to correlate objects detected in two different views using a prescreening program. First, a geometrical model is used to predict the search region for an object in a second view from its location in the first view. The distance between the object and the nipple is used to define the search area. After pairing the objects in two views, textural and morphological characteristics of the paired objects are merged and similarity measures are defined. Linear discriminant analysis is then employed to classify each object pair as a true or false mass pair. The resulting object correspondence score is combined with its one-view detection score using a fusion scheme. The fusion information was found to improve the lesion detectability and reduce the number of FPs. In a preliminary study, we used a data set of 169 pairs of cranio-caudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) view mammograms. For the detection of malignant masses on current mammograms, the film-based detection sensitivity was found to improve from 62% with a one-view detection scheme to 73% with the new two-view scheme, at a false-positive rate of 1 FP/image. The corresponding cased-based detection sensitivity improved from 77% to 91%.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11865995     DOI: 10.1118/1.1446098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Berkman Sahiner; Labomir M Hadjiiski; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Chinatana Paramagul; Jun Ge; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jiazheng Shi; Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Correlative feature analysis on FFDM.

Authors:  Yading Yuan; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Charlene Sennett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automated regional registration and characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis.

Authors:  Peter Filev; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Ge; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Georgia D Tourassi; Jay A Baker; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.

Authors:  Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng; Joseph Ken Leader; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.