Literature DB >> 19175093

Automated regional registration and characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis.

Peter Filev1, Lubomir Hadjiiski, Heang-Ping Chan, Berkman Sahiner, Jun Ge, Mark A Helvie, Marilyn Roubidoux, Chuan Zhou.   

Abstract

A computerized regional registration and characterization system for analysis of microcalcification clusters on serial mammograms is being developed in our laboratory. The system consists of two stages. In the first stage, based on the location of a detected cluster on the current mammogram, a regional registration procedure identifies the local area on the prior that may contain the corresponding cluster. A search program is used to detect cluster candidates within the local area. The detected cluster on the current image is then paired with the cluster candidates on the prior image to form true (TP-TP) or false (TP-FP) pairs. Automatically extracted features were used in a newly designed correspondence classifier to reduce the number of false pairs. In the second stage, a temporal classifier, based on both current and prior information, is used if a cluster has been detected on the prior image, and a current classifier, based on current information alone, is used if no prior cluster has been detected. The data set used in this study consisted of 261 serial pairs containing biopsy-proven calcification clusters. An MQSA radiologist identified the corresponding clusters on the mammograms. On the priors, the radiologist rated the subtlety of 30 clusters (out of the 261 clusters) as 9 or 10 on a scale of 1 (very obvious) to 10 (very subtle). Leave-one-case-out resampling was used for feature selection and classification in both the correspondence and malignant/benign classification schemes. The search program detected 91.2% (238/261) of the clusters on the priors with an average of 0.42 FPs/image. The correspondence classifier identified 86.6% (226/261) of the TP-TP pairs with 20 false matches (0.08 FPs/image) relative to the entire set of 261 image pairs. In the malignant/benign classification stage the temporal classifier achieved a test A(z) of 0.81 for the 246 pairs which contained a detection on the prior. In addition, a classifier was designed by using the clusters on the current mammograms only. It achieved a test A(z) of 0.72 in classifying the clusters as malignant and benign. The difference between the performance of the temporal classifier and the current classifier was statistically significant (p=0.0014). Our interval change analysis system can detect the corresponding cluster on the prior mammogram with high sensitivity, and classify them with a satisfactory accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175093      PMCID: PMC2736718          DOI: 10.1118/1.3002311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.

Authors:  Sophie Paquerault; Nicholas Petrick; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.

Authors:  L Hadjiiski; B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M Gurcan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.

Authors:  María F Salfity; Robert M Nishikawa; Yulei Jiang; John Papaioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance.

Authors:  Sophie Paquerault; Laura M Yarusso; John Papaioannou; Yulei Jiang; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.

Authors:  Saskia van Engeland; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; D Wei; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Automated regional registration and characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis.

Authors:  Peter Filev; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Ge; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S A Feig; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick; V P Jackson; D B Kopans; B Monsees; E A Sickles; C B Stelling; M Zinninger; P Wilcox-Buchalla
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Y Jiang; C E Metz; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Rita E Sohlich; Katherine E Dee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  Automated regional registration and characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis.

Authors:  Peter Filev; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Ge; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Urinary bladder segmentation in CT urography using deep-learning convolutional neural network and level sets.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT using Radiomics with Deep-Learning.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Bladder Cancer Segmentation in CT for Treatment Response Assessment: Application of Deep-Learning Convolution Neural Network-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ajjai Alva; Alon Z Weizer
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.