Literature DB >> 11849875

Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle.

Ji Song1, John C Chappell, Ming Qi, Eric J VanGieson, Sanjiv Kaul, Richard J Price.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that the ultrasound pulsing interval (PI), microbubble injection site and microvascular pressure significantly influence the transport of 100-nm microspheres to muscle through extravasation sites created by the destruction of microbubbles with ultrasound.
BACKGROUND: Microbubbles show promise as targeted drug and gene delivery agents; however, designing optimal microbubble-based therapies will require an understanding of the factors that influence the transport of microbubble-delivered, gene-bearing vehicles to tissue.
METHODS: Ultrasound at 1 MHz, with a peak negative pressure amplitude of 0.75 MPa, was applied to microbubbles and 100-nm microspheres in exteriorized rat spinotrapezius muscle. Ultrasound PIs of 1, 3, 5 and 10 s, arterial microsphere injection times of 10 or 40 s and arterial versus venous injection sites were tested.
RESULTS: Extravasation point creation and microsphere delivery were greatest when the ultrasound PI was 5 or 10 s. No significant differences in extravasation point creation or microsphere delivery were observed with arterial versus venous microbubble injection, but a trend toward increased microsphere delivery with arterial injection may exist. Decreasing the arterial injection time from 40 to 10 s increased microvascular pressure, which, in turn, substantially enhanced microsphere transport to tissue, without a concomitant increase in the number of extravasation points.
CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound PI and microvascular pressure significantly influence the creation of extravasation points and the transport of microspheres to tissue. These factors may be important in designing and optimizing contrast ultrasound-based therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11849875     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01793-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  26 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Mechanisms of microbubble-vessel interactions and induced stresses: a numerical study.

Authors:  N Hosseinkhah; H Chen; T J Matula; P N Burns; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Sophie Hernot; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Acoustic attenuation by contrast agent microbubbles in superficial tissue markedly diminishes petechiae bioeffects in deep tissue.

Authors:  Ji Song; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Richard J Price
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Driving delivery vehicles with ultrasound.

Authors:  Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Ultrasound-activated agents comprised of 5FU-bearing nanoparticles bonded to microbubbles inhibit solid tumor growth and improve survival.

Authors:  Caitlin W Burke; Eben Alexander; Kelsie Timbie; Alexander L Kilbanov; Richard J Price
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage.

Authors:  Stanley Samuel; Michol A Cooper; Joseph L Bull; J Brian Fowlkes; Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Breakup of finite thickness viscous shell microbubbles by ultrasound: a simplified zero-thickness shell model.

Authors:  Chao-Tsung Hsiao; Georges L Chahine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Microbubble destruction with ultrasound augments neovascularisation by bone marrow cell transplantation in rat hind limb ischaemia.

Authors:  S Enomoto; M Yoshiyama; T Omura; R Matsumoto; T Kusuyama; D Nishiya; Y Izumi; K Akioka; H Iwao; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.