Literature DB >> 19560856

An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage.

Stanley Samuel1, Michol A Cooper, Joseph L Bull, J Brian Fowlkes, Douglas L Miller.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct an ex vivo examination of correlation between acoustic emission and tissue damage. Intravital microscopy was employed in conjunction with ultrasound exposure in cremaster muscle of male Wistar rats. Definity microbubbles were administered intravenously through the tail vein (80microL.kg(-1).min(-1)infusion rate) with the aid of a syringe pump. For the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) study, exposures were performed at four locations of the cremaster at a PRF of 1000, 500, 100 and 10Hz (one location per PRF per rat). The 100-pulse exposures were implemented at a peak rarefactional pressure (P(r)) of 2MPa, frequency of 2.25MHz with 46 cycle pulses. For the pressure amplitude threshold study, 100-pulse exposures (46 cycle pulses) were conducted at various peak rarefactional pressures from 0.5MPa to 2MPa at a frequency of 2.25MHz and PRF of 100Hz. Photomicrographs were captured before and 2-min postexposure. On a pulse-to-pulse basis, the 10Hz acoustic emission was considerably higher and more sustained than those at other PRFs (1000, 500, and 100Hz) (p<0.05). Damage, measured as area of extravasation of red blood cells (RBCs), was also significantly higher at 10Hz PRF than at 1000, 500 and 100Hz (p<0.01). The correlation of acoustic emission to tissue damage showed a trend of increasing damage with increasing cumulative function of the relative integrated power spectrum (CRIPS; R(2)=0.75). No visible damage was present at P(r)< or =0.85MPa. Damage, however, was observed at P(r)> or =1.0MPa and it increased with increasing acoustic pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560856      PMCID: PMC2731820          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  25 in total

1.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies.

Authors:  D L Miller; J Quddus
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle.

Authors:  Ji Song; John C Chappell; Ming Qi; Eric J VanGieson; Sanjiv Kaul; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration.

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner; Ji Song; Ananda R Jayaweera; Jiri Sklenar; Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  An open cremaster muscle preparation for the study of blood vessels by in vivo microscopy.

Authors:  S Baez
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 3.514

6.  A comparison of the hemolytic potential of Optison and Albunex in whole human blood in vitro: acoustic pressure, ultrasound frequency, donor and passive cavitation detection considerations.

Authors:  M W Miller; E C Everbach; C Cox; R R Knapp; A A Brayman; T A Sherman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Microvascular flow and tissue PO(2) in skeletal muscle of chronic reduced renal mass hypertensive rats.

Authors:  J H Lombard; J C Frisbee; A S Greene; A G Hudetz; R J Roman; P J Tonellato
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Optical monitoring of ultrasound-induced bioeffects in glass catfish.

Authors:  Subha Maruvada; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents.

Authors:  Peng Li; William F Armstrong; Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  13 in total

1.  In vivo microscopy of targeted vessel occlusion employing acoustic droplet vaporization.

Authors:  Stanley Samuel; Ambroise Duprey; Mario L Fabiilli; Joseph L Bull; Jeffrey Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo.

Authors:  James J Choi; Jameel A Feshitan; Babak Baseri; Shougang Wang; Yao-Sheng Tung; Mark A Borden; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Noninvasive and localized neuronal delivery using short ultrasonic pulses and microbubbles.

Authors:  James J Choi; Kirsten Selert; Fotios Vlachos; Anna Wong; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Jonathan A Kopechek; Jason L Raymond; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Loss of echogenicity and onset of cavitation from echogenic liposomes: pulse repetition frequency independence.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kevin J Haworth; Tao Peng; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  A quantitative pressure and microbubble-size dependence study of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening reversibility in vivo using MRI.

Authors:  Gesthimani Samiotaki; Fotios Vlachos; Yao-Sheng Tung; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Noninvasive and localized blood-brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound can be achieved at short pulse lengths and low pulse repetition frequencies.

Authors:  James J Choi; Kirsten Selert; Zimeng Gao; Gesthimani Samiotaki; Babak Baseri; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  The partitioning of nanoparticles to endothelium or interstitium during ultrasound-microbubble-targeted delivery depends on peak-negative pressure.

Authors:  Y-H Hsiang; J Song; R J Price
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 9.  Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelsie F Timbie; Brian P Mead; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Controlled ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption using passive acoustic emissions monitoring.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Margaret S Livingstone; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.