Literature DB >> 18424953

Acoustic attenuation by contrast agent microbubbles in superficial tissue markedly diminishes petechiae bioeffects in deep tissue.

Ji Song1, Alexander L Klibanov, John A Hossack, Richard J Price.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure how ultrasound attenuation by contrast agent microbubbles (MBs) in superficial tissue affects petechiae creation in underlying deep tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies using Sprague-Dawley rats were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee. MBs were injected intravenously, and 12 ultrasound pulses (100 sinusoids of 1 MHz ultrasound per pulse) were applied through the skin overlying the hindlimb adductors at intervals of 10 or 60 seconds. In some groups, the skin was resected and immediately returned without re-establishing vascular connections. Muscle petechiae were counted.
RESULTS: Applying ultrasound through unperfused skin after bolus and continuous intravenous MB injection yielded, respectively, 30-fold and 3.5-fold more petechiae than for perfused skin. Surprisingly, petechiae/mm2 decreased with a higher MB dosage [0.12 +/- 0.05 (1 x 10 MBs/g) vs. 0.04 +/- 0.02 (3 x 10 MBs/g)] when ultrasound was applied through perfused skin. In contrast, petechiae/mm2 was approximately proportional to MB dosage for unperfused skin [0.17 +/- 0.10(5) (1 x 10 MBs/g) vs. 0.42 + 0.14 (3 x 10(5) MBs/g)]. In comparison to MB-free controls, MB solutions in this concentration range reduced the peak-negative pressure of ultrasound by 65% to 85%.
CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic attenuation by MBs in skin markedly reduces petechiae creation in deep muscle. Petechiae inhibition is dependent on [MB]2.1 and, therefore, dominates the otherwise proportional relationship between petechiae and [MB] in muscle. The drop of peak-negative pressure below a critical microvessel rupturing threshold is the probable mechanism for petechiae inhibition. These results indicate that high MB doses could, paradoxically, reduce the potential for petechiae creation and may have important bearing on the design of contrast ultrasound-based therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424953      PMCID: PMC2714264          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318168c715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  38 in total

Review 1.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jarl A Jakobsen; Raymond Oyen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Targeted delivery of bone marrow mononuclear cells by ultrasound destruction of microbubbles induces both angiogenesis and arteriogenesis response.

Authors:  Takanobu Imada; Tetsuya Tatsumi; Yasukiyo Mori; Takashi Nishiue; Masayuki Yoshida; Hiroya Masaki; Mitsuhiko Okigaki; Hiroyuki Kojima; Yoshihisa Nozawa; Yasunobu Nishiwaki; Noriko Nitta; Toshiji Iwasaka; Hiroaki Matsubara
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Pathologic skeletal muscle perfusion in patients with myositis: detection with quantitative contrast-enhanced US--initial results.

Authors:  Marc-André Weber; Martin Krix; Uta Jappe; Hagen B Huttner; Marius Hartmann; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Marco Essig; Christoph Fiehn; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue.

Authors:  D M Skyba; R J Price; A Z Linka; T C Skalak; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Influence of contrast agent dose and ultrasound exposure on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Peng Li; Chunyan Dou; David Gordon; Chris A Edwards; William F Armstrong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Treatment of ischemic limbs based on local recruitment of vascular endothelial growth factor-producing inflammatory cells with ultrasonic microbubble destruction.

Authors:  Junji Yoshida; Koji Ohmori; Hiroto Takeuchi; Kaori Shinomiya; Tsunetatsu Namba; Isao Kondo; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Masakazu Kohno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Microvascular remodeling and accelerated hyperemia blood flow restoration in arterially occluded skeletal muscle exposed to ultrasonic microbubble destruction.

Authors:  Ji Song; Patrick S Cottler; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Richard J Price
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Demonstration and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  T R Porter; F Xie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ultrasound image-guided therapy enhances antitumor effect of cisplatin.

Authors:  Noboru Sasaki; Nobuki Kudo; Kensuke Nakamura; Sue Yee Lim; Masahiro Murakami; W R Bandula Kumara; Yu Tamura; Hiroshi Ohta; Masahiro Yamasaki; Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  MR-Guided Delivery of Hydrophilic Molecular Imaging Agents Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Through Focused Ultrasound.

Authors:  Raag D Airan; Catherine A Foss; Nicholas P K Ellens; Yuchuan Wang; Ronnie C Mease; Keyvan Farahani; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences.

Authors:  Sara Keller; Matthew Bruce; Michalakis A Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Covalently linking poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles to microbubbles before intravenous injection improves their ultrasound-targeted delivery to skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Caitlin W Burke; Yu-Han J Hsiang; Eben Alexander; Alexander L Kilbanov; Richard J Price
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Localized in vivo model drug delivery with intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; Douglas K Bowles; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Inhibition of glioma growth by microbubble activation in a subcutaneous model using low duty cycle ultrasound without significant heating.

Authors:  Caitlin W Burke; Alexander L Klibanov; Jason P Sheehan; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  The partitioning of nanoparticles to endothelium or interstitium during ultrasound-microbubble-targeted delivery depends on peak-negative pressure.

Authors:  Y-H Hsiang; J Song; R J Price
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.253

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.