Literature DB >> 11839278

Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.

Stephen R Jackson1, Roger Newport, Andrew Shaw.   

Abstract

It has been argued that visual perception and the visual control of action depend upon functionally distinct and anatomically separable brain systems. Electrophysiological evidence indicates that binocular vision may be particularly important for the visuomotor processing within the posterior parietal cortex, and neuropsychological and psychophysical studies confirm that binocular vision is crucial for the accurate planning and control of prehension movements. An unresolved issue concerns the consequences for visuomotor processing of removing binocular vision. By one account, monocular viewing leads to reliance upon pictorial visual cues to calibrate grasping and results in disruption to normal size-constancy mechanisms. This proposal is based on the finding that maximum grip apertures are reduced with monocular vision. By a second account, monocular viewing results in the loss of binocular visual cues and leads to strategic changes in visuomotor processing by way of altered safety margins. This proposal is based on the finding that maximum grip apertures are increased with monocular vision. We measured both grip aperture and grip force during prehension movements executed with binocular and monocular viewing. We demonstrate that each of the above accounts may be correct and can be observed within the same task. Specifically, we show that, while grip apertures increase with monocular vision, consistent with altered visuomotor safety margins, maximum grip force is nevertheless reduced, consistent with a misperception of object size. These results are related to differences in visual processing required for calibrating grip aperture and grip force during reaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11839278     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00682-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  8 in total

1.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of grasping responses to distorted object size and orientation.

Authors:  Cornelia Weigelt; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Epistemology of visual imaging in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stereopsis contributes to the predictive control of grip forces during prehension.

Authors:  Corey A Mroczkowski; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Binocular Viewing Facilitates Size Constancy for Grasping and Manual Estimation.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Michael Cao; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Retinal versus physical stimulus size as determinants of visual perception in simultanagnosia.

Authors:  Elisabeth Huberle; Jon Driver; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Mithu Storoni; Georgina Todd; Alison L Finlay; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Perceptual uncertainty and action consequences independently affect hand movements in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Anna Nowakowska; Julie M Harris; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.